Connectivism is an approach to learning based on the idea that knowledge is not an entity, but rather a process within a network. As described by Stephen Downes,
“At its heart, connectivism is the thesis that knowledge is distributed across a network of connections, and therefore that learning consists of the ability to construct and traverse those networks. Knowledge, therefore, is not acquired, as though it were a thing. It is not transmitted, as though it were some type of communication. What we learn, what we know — these are literally the connections we form between neurons as a result of experience. The brain is composed of 100 billion neurons, and these form some 100 trillion connections and it is these connections that constitute everything we know, everything we believe, everything we imagine. And while it is convenient to talk as though knowledge and beliefs are composed of sentences and concepts that we somehow acquire and store, it is more accurate – and pedagogically more useful — to treat learning as the formation of connections.”
How different is this from the “Grandgrind” view of education?
NOW, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!
(Gradgrind – the teacher in Dickens’ Hard Times)
I was never a fan of the Grandgrind approach, but its becoming ever more clear just how foolish and unrealistic it is.