Meaning-full Disease. Brian Broom
ISBN 978-1-85575-463-8
I read a reference to Brian Broom’s work in “Why Do People Get Ill?“, and like that book, his “Meaning-full Disease” should go on every doctor and would-be doctor’s reading list – not just on their shelves, but in their active reading list. Professor Broom leads the post-graduate programme in MindBody Healthcare at Auckland University of Technology and works as a physician specialising in allergies and clinical immunology, a psychotherapist and a mindbody specialist in Christchurch. That tells you something about what you might expect from this book. His main area of interest is psychosomatic disease. This is a term which has fallen out of favour and come to mean illnesses without any associated physical disease. However, it is making a comeback thanks to work like this and Leader and Corfield‘s work amongst others. It is particularly making a comeback because of its focus on the links between the body and the mind in illnesses where there are significant pathological changes to be found.
Broom explores the truly fascinating observations that patients’ physical diseases are often best understood by uncovering the meanings that their illnesses have for them. He pleas for a more holistic, more humane practice of medicine by placing the scientific world view in its rightful place – not as the bearer of all truth, but as a subset of experience.
“the lifeworld is a rich, multidimensional, experienced reality of which the scientific world is a part-representation, a reduction, or an abstraction.”
He sets out a powerful argument for seeing both subjective and objective experience as different manifestations of an underlying unified phenomenon, referring to both phenomenologists such as Merleau-Ponty and Husserl, and Japanese writers, Yasua and Ichikowa (the latter he quotes as saying “my ‘object-body’ and my ‘subject-body’ are inseparably united in their deeper layer, and cannot be separated clearly and decisively, except through intellectual abstraction”. I particularly enjoyed his reflections on this so-called divide between objective and subjective where he says to touch your left hand with your right – as you do this you experience you left hand objectively and in the same moment subjectively your left hand feels touched. He goes on to muse about the position of hands pressed together in prayer which similarly dissolves the barriers between subjective and objective. A lovely image and a nice way to get us thinking about these two ways of experiencing the world.
There is much more to illness than the biomedical model elucidates for us. This in no way devalues the model which is still a powerful way to not only conceptualise disease but to treat it, but trying to understand a person’s whole experience by seeking what lies behind the pathology requires quite other skills which doctors are sadly not so strongly encouraged to acquire. One of the best passages in Professor Broom’s book is where he describes the process of his work moving back and forth in a consultation between the “thing of the illness and it’s meaning”. Sounds like how a consultation should be.
[…] 12th, 2007 by bobleckridge From Brian Broom’s Meaning-full Disease – Goethe showed science a new approach…..of seeing the whole world symbolised in a flower, an […]
[…] Oct 14th, 2007 by bobleckridge The easiest way to offend a patient is to fail to engage with their reality by projecting our assumptions, theories and realities upon them. – Brian Bloom. Meaningful Disease. […]
[…] in the USA with the title ‘Why do people get sick?’), and Brian Broom’s ‘Meaning-full Disease‘, are, I found both easy to read and excellent at setting out a compelling case for the […]
[…] about some of the interesting work on the links between symptoms and diseases – see the posts about Meaning-full Disease and Why Do People Get […]
To understand and engage the whole human being – body and mind as one – in the process of treatment – this is a great challenge to medicine.
The tremendous advance of modern western medicine owes a lot to the thinking that came with the age of machines and scientific reason: to look for pragmatic, efficient and reproducible solutions; to regard the human as a biological machine that can be decomposed into parts which then can be examined and fixed individually.
This approach has been working quite well, however I can’t help to notice that it has put medicine into a situation where we sometimes fail to reach beyond symptoms and find it easier and less fearsome to deal with the patient as a biological machine rather than as a person. But we are much more complex beings and there is a deep belief among people that the well being of mind and spirit is equally important for good health. In this I very much agree with your article “Person-sized Medicine”.
Perhaps ironically, it was the recent discoveries in neuro-science that made a hard case in “molecular-sized” medicine for a more holistic approach to health. So, sooner or later we arrive at truth 🙂
Going for “person-sized” medicine is not going to be easy though. At present there is a huge economic pressure to continue with “anonymous-biological-machine-on-a-conveyor-belt” treatment: tight health-care budgets, cost control, plans and waiting lists, bureaucracy, etc, etc. I can’t see how holistic medicine, which requires time, patience, compassion and a deeper engagement with the patient, can work under such pressured circumstances.
But I’m confident. Truth cannot be hidden and if holistic medicine really is the way ahead, eventually we should recognise its benefits, and yes, even find a solid economic case for it.
[…] sensations, you could start with the excellent “Why do People Get Ill?” or “Meaning-full Disease“. Eco World Content From Across The Internet. Featured on EcoPressed Study Says Sea […]