Don’t you hate it when people judge you? And don’t you hate it when people assume they know all about you because they’ve stuck you in some pigeon hole? You know the kind of thing. I mentioned in another post sitting on the train recently next to two men who spent the whole journey dismissing huge swathes of humanity – doctors they said were only interested in one thing – money; Iraq was always a hell-hole, now it was just a hell-hole with less buildings; everyone who lives below the Mason-Dixon line is an in-breeder……and on and on and on. These are not uncommon conversations.
One way we function as human beings is to focus on part of reality, classify it and judge it. We do that to try and get a sense that we understand the world and we also do it to try and control our experience of reality. The thing is this strategy brings loads of bad side-effects. For a start, generalised judgement stops thought. Once you judge a whole class of something, you stop thinking about it. By that I mean you stop seeing, stop hearing, stop experiencing the context-sensitive reality of the individual member of that “class”.
I find this way of thinking very, very disturbing. I understand why it’s there, and I know that human beings are incapable of experiencing the totality of experience as it is. We can only perceive and experience aspects of reality at any given moment. But when we are not aware of the enormous down-side of this human function then we are no longer living in the real world. Instead we limit our experience of reality to our pigeon-hole set. We see everything through the thick discoloured lenses we’ve made for ourselves.
This happens in all areas of life. In Medicine, it happens with diagnoses. How sad it is to see people classified as a “case of X” and how much more sad it is to meet a person who can only see themselves as a “case of X”. When we squeeze every patient into a tightly defined diagnostic box we stop seeing them as who they are. People with mental illnesses experiences this a lot. Once they’ve been given a “diagnosis” they often find that all of their experience is interpreted by the doctors as part of that diagnosis. This is what leads to bad and dangerous prescribing. I recently saw a patient who had suffered from a variety of symptoms for the last couple of years. He was investigated at the outset of the illness and given a particular diagnosis. The diagnosis was wrong. But despite the fact that every time he saw his doctors he told them that certain treatments weren’t working they wouldn’t listen. The doctors said they were prescribing the right medicine for his problem. But they weren’t! Luckily, he got sicker and ended up with other doctors and a different investigation which revealed the true diagnosis. Since getting the appropriate treatment for that condition he’s not in a wheelchair any more.
We also stop experiencing the reality of the rich uniqueness of every human being when we classify them according to race, religion, accent, or life-style. It’s sad and it’s such a stupid way to live. Next time you catch yourself, or somebody else, saying that “all X are Y”, challenge them. All X are never all Y! And if you think they are, you’ve lost touch with reality.
I completely agree with you about pigeon-holing; rarely does anything ever fit any of the little mental compartments we’ve built for it. And on the rare occasion when it does fit the compartment, it’s usually only part of the whole thing (if that makes sense?)
Ideally, I think a concept should function as a window to reality, not an image of reality. Making those sorts of generalizations is like sticking a painting over a window—we don’t see what’s actually going on outside any more!
Incidentally, I happen to disagree with every single generalization those gentlemen made! 😀
I think we have to judge and categorize at some point. It’s inevitable and there is nothing wrong with it if that’s the way our minds work.
Let’s say you’ve met someone and you liked them, you labeled them as the sort of people whom you like! and then you’ve judge them to make a decision about friendship for example.
Oh I like that gukseon – window rather than image! Not a stained glass window like in a church then??
I agree sugarmouse, we do need to judge. How would I make a diagnosis if I never made a decision? But I think the important thing is too not hold to these judgements too tightly, never to mistake them for THE TRUTH, and be open to dropping them and seeing things differently
I also think that the more generalised a judgement is, the flakier it is!
“Oh I like that gukseon – window rather than image! Not a stained glass window like in a church then??”
Heh, I think ideally the glass should be clear, but in reality it probably is stained, more often than not… 😉
Sugar Mouse, I agree judgement is both necessary and inevitable but it should be an open judgement; in science as well as in life in general I think we should always be willing to revise our judgements in light of new data, new information, new contexts.
Bob I also agree with you about generalized judgements, which I think ties in with your comments about “personality disorder” here.
[…] (Note: this was originally a response to Bob Leckridge’s excellent post about “pigeon-holing”). […]