Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June, 2008

Living ALL your life

It’s not uncommon for people to talk about looking forward to retirement. In fact, longing for retirement. Even counting the days until they retire. But once they retire, then what? It’s probably because I love everything I do, and how I especially love my daily work, that the idea of retirement seems to me, well, put it this way………it’s how we think about illness and death – they are things that happen to other people! But increasingly people have a lot of life to live after the age of 65. Why’s this come to my mind just now? Well, in the Queen’s honours last week, one of the people honoured was Phyllis Self who turned 100 last year. One of the remarkable things about Phyllis is that she runs a garden centre – at age 100 that’s quite something – but here’s the thing that really struck me – there was a mention of the fact that she has run this garden centre for 36 years. That means she didn’t actually start the garden centre until she was 64 years old!

How many people do you know started a new business at the age of “retirement”? We need to think about life differently. We need to live ALL of our lives. Retirement should be a time of active engagement with life.

Read Full Post »

Garlic

fresh garlic

Garlic contains a substance called “Allicin“. Studies have shown that this substance can have beneficial effects on cancer, bacterial infections and in preventing blood clots. Research suggests that this substance is very fragile and if you want to benefit from it you should eat fresh garlic rather than bottles of chopped garlic.

The photo above shows the market in Aix en Provence. I’d never seen garlic for sale with such extensive roots! Apparently this is the freshest garlic you can find.

The garlic we use in cooking is “allium sativa”. There are a number of related garlic plants with different ones growing wild in different countries. The scent of wild garlic in a forest can be very powerful. Here’s some wild garlic I found by following my nose!

wild garlic

wild garlic

Read Full Post »

Apprivoise moi

One of the key scenes in Le Petit Prince is where the little fox appears. The fox declines the little prince’s invitation to play saying “you are still nothing more than a little boy who is just like a hundred thousand other little boys. And I have no need of you. And you, on your part, have no need of me. To you, I am nothing more than a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes.” This is what it’s like on a busy commuter train or as you weave your way through a crowded city street. You come close to many people; you might sit right next to them for an hour or so; or you might buy a coffee in the cafe right after they do and sit at a neighbouring table; but you don’t know each other, mean nothing to each other, make no kind of connection.

The fox says “Apprivoise moi”. What does this mean? The direct English translation is “Tame me”, but taming in English suggest some subjugation, some domination, and that’s not what is meant by the fox. Instead he means something like “befriend me”, or “captivate me”, “bind yourself to me” or “make me yours”. It’s a loving expression and it conveys the idea of creating a link or a bond between two people, or between a person and a creature. The fox says that if the little prince does this he will make them unique to each other in the world. He will make them special to each other.

The little prince takes this idea and thinks about a bed of roses he comes across and how all of these roses really mean nothing to him compared to the single rose which he has nurtured carefully in his garden. His rose is uniquely his. He is bound to her. She is special to him.

Later, the little prince saw a garden of roses. “You are not at all like my rose,” he said. “As yet you are nothing. No one has befriended you, and you are no one’s friend. You are like my fox when I first knew him. He was only a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes. But I have made him my friend, and now he is unique in all the world… He went on. “To be sure, an ordinary passerby would think that my rose looked just like you. But in herself alone she is more important than all the hundreds of you other roses: because it is she that I have watered, because it is she that I have listened to, because she is my rose.”

It’s an interesting concept, isn’t it? How we create loving bonds between ourselves and others, and in so doing, make people (or animals) special to us, make them unique.

Read Full Post »

The TV News each evening doesn’t carry many uplifting stories but tonight on channel 4 news they had a piece that grabbed me and fed my optimistic nature. It was about Filmclub. This is a project started by Director, Beeban Kidron, which introduces movies into schools throughout England. She’s had a trial running and it’s been hugely successful so it’s now being rolled out around the rest of the country.

“I think that stories and the telling of stories are the foundations of human communication and understanding. If children all over the country are watching films, asking questions and telling their stories, then the world will eventually be a better place. That’s how important I think FILMCLUB is.”

Oh, I agree, Beeban. Stories and the telling of stories really are the foundation of what it is to be human. Filmclub’s co-founder, Lindsay Mackie said –

“ Films have the power to raise your gaze and raise your game and give you a ticket to pleasure and enlightenment forever more….”

YES! Well, that’s aiming high, isn’t it? How wonderful!

I use movies a LOT in my teaching (I teach mainly doctors, but also nurses, dentists, vets and other health care workers). I know that some of you (yes, mrschili, I’m talking to you!) also use movies a lot in your own teaching work. This Filmclub idea has sparked a thought for me – what if I started a Filmclub for patients in the hospital where I worked? If I was going to do that, which movies would I show? Patients are often suffering and in distress. Which movies might be catalysts to discussions which encourage healing? Any suggestions?

Read Full Post »

Dementia is such an awful disease. It can be utterly harrowing to see the loss of self and independence of a loved one. I find it such a sad illness. So I was interested to read this piece of research from JAMA today.

One of the most difficult problems for dementia sufferers and their carers is the disruption of the normal circadian rhythms, so these researchers tried two interventions which might make a difference – melatonin and light. The patients who were treated with melatonin did experience improvement in their sleep but their mood deteriorated and they became withdrawn. Bright lights were fitted to the care homes and kept on throughout the day. Residents who lived with the brighter light AND who took melatonin showed the greatest benefits in both cognitive function and in reduction of depressive symptoms. The authors conclude by recommending the light plus melatonin regime, but point out that increased light alone made a difference and that melatonin without increased light should not be recommended because of the adverse effects on mood.

This is a nice study. Very simple intervention which apparently can make a useful difference.

Read Full Post »

asparagus

One day at the local market in Aix I saw this stall. Have you ever seen this much asparagus for sale? There’s a whole wall of it here!

I think asparagus is really tasty, but I don’t remember ever tasting it as a child. Do you have any foodstuffs which you didn’t taste until you became an adult but which you discovered you really enjoyed?

I decided to check out wikipedia and see what I could find out about asparagus before I posted this photo. I was interested to read that it has certain medicinal properties – not least that it can bring on an attack of gout, but that it’s been a traditional medicine for the treatment of urinary tract infections and stones.

There was one surprising fact I discovered though – it’s about the way asparagus consumption changes the smell of your urine! Apparently Marcel Proust commented on this claiming that asparagus “…transforms my chamber-pot into a flask of perfume.” It’s something I’ve been very aware of since I first ate asparagus, but the one thing I didn’t know was that only 40% of the population have the genes needed to be able to smell it! This may be something peculiar about the way my mind works but that fact suddenly made me think of the old zen puzzle – does a tree falling in the forest, where nobody is present, make a noise?

Isn’t it interesting that a smell might only exist if the person doing the smelling has a certain gene? Oh, and what on earth are we doing with a gene for smelling the metabolites of asparagus in the urine?

Read Full Post »

I love movies. I’m an addict. I think it’s my insatiable thirst for stories which hooks me. I’m not a fan of the blockbuster kind of movie that’s all special effects though. I like a movie which draws me in and absorbs me in the characters and the story. Of course, that fits with my other great addiction – books. I’m really never without a book and I’m often reading more than one book at a time.

I think movies are called movies, not just because they are “moving pictures” but because they can be so “moving” – they can stir our emotions so strongly. How do they do that? Well, here’s a slightly disturbing piece of research. Using the fMRI technique (the brain scan that shows which areas of the brain are active at any given moment) researchers observed which parts of the brain became active at particular moments in different movies and they used an interesting tool called “ISC” (Inter-subject Correlation) to see if different people had the same parts of the brain lighting up at the same moments. They picked a Hitchcock movie, “Bang! You’re Dead!”, “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, an episode of “Curb your Enthusiasm”, and an unedited video clip of a concert. The results were very different –

  • The Hitchcock episode evoked similar responses across all viewers in over 65 percent of the neocortex, indicating a high level of control on viewers’ minds;
  • High ISC was also extensive (45 percent) for “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”;
  • Lower ISC was recorded for “Curb Your Enthusiasm” (18 percent) and for the Washington Square Park, or unstructured reality, clip (less than 5 percent)

In other words, Hitchcock really was the master. His movie evoked the most similar responses in peoples’ brains.

“Our data suggest that achieving a tight control over viewers’ brains during a movie requires, in most cases, intentional construction of the film’s sequence through aesthetic means,” the researchers wrote. “The fact that Hitchcock was able to orchestrate the responses of so many different brain regions, turning them on and off at the same time across all viewers, may provide neuroscientific evidence for his notoriously famous ability to master and manipulate viewers’ minds. Hitchcock often liked to tell interviewers that for him ‘creation is based on an exact science of audience reactions.’ “

The researchers claim that these techniques pave the way for the development of “neurocinematic studies” – oh my!

Read Full Post »

heart of the poppy, originally uploaded by bobsee.

I was walking down to town and spotted some large poppies in someone’s front garden.
Oh, look at this one!
This is one of those flowers you can lose yourself in!

Read Full Post »

I’m sure you are very familiar with this phrase. You’ve either said it or thought it, and if you haven’t, then, at least, you’ve sure heard it said.

Sometimes somebody expresses a view, or behaves in a way, that is so different to how we would view or do something that it can feel as if they don’t actually live in the same world as we do.

Saint-Exupery, in “The Little Prince”, has this theme running right through his brilliant, thought-provoking little story. The philosopher, Ravoux, says that the main theme of “Le Petit Prince” is the difficulty we find in making connections. We all experience the world from the first person perspective, and we have no way of experiencing the world from another person’s perspective. Not wholly. Not fully. We use language and fashion stories to try to convey our views and our experiences to others. We use imagination and empathy to try and put ourselves in others’ shoes, but it’s not easy.

The Little Prince visits six, very small, planets. In fact, the planets he visits are so small (really they are asteroids) that only one person can live on each of them. Saint-Exupery uses the common device of pushing each example to an extreme to make it more clear (Deleuze favours this technique, stating that we should push something to its extreme point to reveal its true character).

On the first planet lives a king. He needs to be in control of everything. But he isn’t stupid. He knows his limitations and has rationalised his experience to fit with his need. He only commands to happen what he knows will happen. The Little Prince sees that this is what the king does and finds it absurd, but lots of people are like this. The important issue of them is of feeling in control of everything. The need for control lies deep within us all. When it becomes all-consuming it becomes the standard against which everything is experienced.

The second planet is inhabited by a man who needs to be told that he is the most handsome, most admired man in the world. When The Little Prince points out that there is nobody else on this man’s planet, the man dismisses the point, saying “admire me anyway”. In our present time the cult of celebrity runs very, very strong. It doesn’t matter what you’re famous for, as long as you’re famous. Admire me! Admire me! Notice me!

The third planet is the world of a drunkard. He tells The Little Prince he is ashamed because he drinks so much and he drinks to forget. Forget what? Forget that I am ashamed! Alcohol and drugs as a way of life? You sure know people like this.

The fourth planet is inhabited by “the businessman” who sits at his desk, counting his possessions and ordering them. He claims he owns all the stars in the universe, and when challenged about how this can be so, he shows the pieces of paper which represent his ownership. It’s not the actual stars which matter, it’s the owning them! The Little Prince finds this idea equally absurd.

The fifth planet is where a lamplighter lives. His planet is so small that day and night are only a minute long each, so the poor man is trapped in a constant cycle of lighting and extinguishing the lamps. The Little Prince points out that if he walked slowly round his planet following the light, he could have a break from the continuous cycle of his work, but the man can’t do that. He says it’s important to follow the rules and that’s what he is doing. He is following the rules. Lots of people only feel safe when they strictly follow the rules.

The sixth and final planet is the one where The Little Prince finds a geographer. This man sits at a desk writing down all the reports which people bring him to create the complete knowledge of the planet. However, he never leaves the desk to go and experience the planet for himself. The Little Prince finds it strange that someone can think they can know everything about a place without experiencing it.

We are all different and we are all unique. I can never know if what I experience as “red” when looking at a red rose, is what you experience as “red”. But we can both agree to give our experiences the same name.

Cemetry rose

Owen Flanagan explores this issue with his idea of “spaces of meaning” where he makes it clear that we each have different ways of making sense of the world. Mary Midgley argues the same point with her analogy of the aquarium which we can only see into through the small windows which are personally available to us.

So, if we really all are on our own planets, with our own sets of values and ways of making sense of things, each of us with our individual world views, then how can we connect? How can relate to other people in their other worlds? Well we need to hear their stories because only they can tell us what they have experienced. And we need to hear their stories using something fundamental and special, Saint-Exupery tells us, and that is LOVE.

It’s LOVE that allows us to connect, to see, hear and understand each others’ worldviews, and it takes LOVE to break down the barriers of isolation and loneliness.

Read Full Post »

It’s a strange thing, the present. We consider three time zones, don’t we? The past, the present and the future. A lot of patients I see are suffering because they are trapped in one of these time zones (and it’s not the present!). We experience the past through our use of memory. The past doesn’t exist. Not any more. We can only bring it back to life by remembering. Remembering is something we do. The future doesn’t exist. Not yet. We can only bring it to life by imagining. Imagining is something we do. So if we do remembering to experience the past, and imagining to experience the future, then what do we do to experience the present?

Usually when I think about experiencing the present, I concentrate on my senses, and becoming aware of what I’m hearing, seeing, tasting, smelling or touching. Amy, at livelessordinary, has written beautifully about just that way of living in the present.

I was reading “Donner un sens a l’existence“, by Jean-Philippe Ravoux, recently. Jean-Philippe is a French philosopher who has written about the philosophical basis of “Le Petit Prince”. He makes a strong point about the present which, when I read it, made me suddenly stop and think. Some of the greatest truths are the simplest ones. He says that living in the present is about acting. He says that we can ONLY act in the present. The present is the ONLY time we can DO anything. When I read that point, it was as if a penny dropped. Until then I had considered living in the present as a fairly passive affair – a time of sitting still, being quiet, savouring, sensing consciously and mindfully. Well, I still think all that is true, but look at all the verbs in that sentence! The present isn’t something that just happens to us, or passes us by. It’s what we do.

The way to live in the present is to be conscious of what you are choosing to do.

What are you doing right now? Reading? Thinking? Drinking tea or coffee? Remembering? Imagining? All these actions are your actions. These actions, these choices, are how you create your experience of living. William Glasser understood that when he developed Reality Therapy. Living in the present – it’s what we do!

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »