Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July, 2008

clouds

Read Full Post »

I took this photo at an open air antique/bric a brac market (one person’s junk is another person’s antiques, they say…….I do remember once seeing a sign in a shop window which said “We buy junk. We sell antiques”!)

bric a brac

This is one of those photos which I find endlessly fascinating. What are all these things? What was held in those bottles? What’s in those little tightly wrapped packages? Who would think to put together a manikin’s head, a pencil case, a crucifix, a hammer and all these containers? Maybe this will stimulate your creativity….let me know if it does.

Read Full Post »

As I wandered along the Cours Mirabeau one weekend recently, one whole side of the street was a bric a brac market. These two frames caught my eye.

framed
reflected

The first one, you’ll see, is an old, gilt, frame, with the tree and the chair showing through the framed space. It caught my eye, and somehow made me think of a gateway into another world. The fact there’s no canvas there turns the picture into an opening.

The second one, at first, looked just like the first. Then I looked more closely and saw it was a very old mirror. Reflecting something behind me. Not reflecting it very clearly though. Because it’s so old, the reflection has become misted and unclear.

Both of these photos stimulate my thoughts about perception. How we focus on only part of what we can see. How we frame part of reality, reducing it to understandable, manageable pieces. And how what lies behind us becomes more dim, less clear, with the passing of the years

Read Full Post »

16 in 1

I’ve just embarked upon a study of the Abhidamma – it’s a Buddhist text which is referred to as THE main text on Buddhist psychology. Buddhist psychology is becoming more prominent in recent times because those who write about neuroscientific approaches to the Mind, researchers and philosophers interested in phenomena like consciousness and perception are discovering that many of the Buddhist insights help them with their more biomedical approaches.

This concept suddenly stopped me in my tracks – we tend to perceive reality as being like a series of events. We divide time into the past, the present and the future, and the present is the time period which is the hardest to pin down because as soon as you think about it, it’s slipped into the past! One way of modelling this concept of reality is the movie. We know that a movie is made up from a long series of still photos. When we run the film past our eyes quickly we don’t actually see any of the single frames. Instead, we see movement. So maybe the way to understand reality is to break down the flow of experience into events….like the individual frames of the movie. I’ve wondered about this a few times but the author of the text I’m reading suddenly turned it on its head and that’s what stopped me in my tracks.

He said, what if we think about it in quite the opposite way? What if reality is the flow, and the individual frames, or events are artificial? In other words, there are no events, there is only flow. Slicing the flow into pieces is artificial and gives us the impression that we can understand reality by considering disconnected small segments of it.

This is exactly the problem we have with materialistic, reductionist science. We are told that science can describe complete phenomena as entities, things, or “facts”. But that’s artificial. Reality is flow, is connection and process and cannot be reduced to fixed units. Fortunately, the new developments in science have taken this on board. The new ways include thinking about complexity, chaos, networks and systems. They have a dynamic focus, not a fixed one.

Oh, what’s that photo above? My camera has a function called “16 shot” – you press the shutter release and it takes 16 photos in rapid succession and shows you the results as a single image. This is a photo of a wave. Not only does the phenomenon of a wave act as an interesting example of how see “entitities”, of things, by slicing up the flow of reality, but it reminds us of the impermanence of everything and of the constancy of change.

Read Full Post »

I came across this quote from the poet, W.H Auden…..

Among those whom I like or admire, I can find no common denominator, but among those whom I love, I can: all of them make me laugh.

It’s one of those quotations which instantly resonates as a truth, isn’t it? I think it’s true, but I’m not so sure about the other way round…….do I love those who make me laugh? Well, I’m certainly better disposed towards them, certainly LIKE them, but I can’t say I feel love towards all who make me laugh. I can’t think of anyone who I do love, who doesn’t make me laugh however. There’s something very bonding about sharing laughter with those we love.

Here’s the strange thing though, when I first read that quote, I read it quickly and I thought, yes, that’s true, all those whom I love, can make me laugh, and, yes, there’s no common denominator amongst those who I don’t like. But, hey, wait a moment! I just re-read the quote to post about it and it doesn’t say that! It says there’s no common denominator amongst those I “like or admire”. Goodness! How could I have mis-read that so significantly! Well, I did. I’d understand it if I had mis-read it, reading a “truth” instead of a phrase which didn’t ring true for me, but that’s not the explanation. I actually agree with the whole quote. Guess I focused in on the phrase which really resonated most strongly – the bit about all those I love being able to make me laugh, and then read the first part of the quote, seeing the opposite there – those I don’t love, in fact, those I don’t even like. Well, well. Just goes to show, we don’t always read a sentence in a straight linear manner and it’s not difficult to see what we preconceive, instead of what we perceive.

Read Full Post »

Look at this

200 generations illustrated

This is a little drawing to illustrate the fact that there have been only 200 generations (each of about 25 years) since the beginning of recorded history right up to the present time. Isn’t that amazing? This grabbed me for two reasons. First, it really captures just how little time has passed since we began to record human history. That’s quite mind boggling (and humbling) in itself. But, secondly, it was the simplicity of the image which really caught my attention. I came across this on the digital roam blog…..that’s Dan Roam’s blog.

Dan Roam has written a book about using visual thinking and I think it looks GREAT. The book is called “Back of the Napkin”. Every day I draw simple little pictures for patients to help explain quite complex ideas like health, disease, healing, how to tackle allergies, and so on. Dan’s set up a web site to accompany his book. Go and check it out. He’s made a great little series of flash videos which I highly recommend. There are four of them (drawn on the back of a napkin!). Watch them all. It’ll only take a few minutes and I bet you’ll find it thought provoking about how we see and how we communicate with pictures.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts