I enjoyed this.
You might too
Posted in humour, life, personal growth on September 9, 2007| 3 Comments »
Posted in from the dark room, photography on September 8, 2007| Leave a Comment »
A little flower, originally uploaded by bobsee.
As I walked through the park these tiny little flowers caught my eye. Despite my great love of plants, I’m dreadful at knowing their names! Anyone know what this is?
But look at the detail!
I can lose myself for AGES in this flower!
Posted in life on September 8, 2007| 4 Comments »
I stumbled across this 30,000 days figure the other day. Apparently its about how many days there are in an average life. Well, I thought, never being one to take what I read completely on trust, is this right? So I popped over to the General Register Office for Scotland website where they’ve just published the latest life expectancy figures for Scotland and it turns out that for Scottish males its currently 74.6 years. My Dad was 80 at the end of last year and is alive and well so I’m hoping that, like him, I won’t be average! (Don’t we all?!). Let me err on the side of cautious optimism though and assume the average. I then went to timeanddate.com which has all kinds of date calculators for you to use. I fed in the figures.
For the average Scottish male you can expect 27,035 days of life (quite a lot short of the 30,000!)
For me, today, 8th September 2007, I’ve lived 19,391 days! Wooosh!!!! Where did THEY go??!!
If I can reckon on the average, I’ve 7,644 days left to enjoy.
This is where I turn to Seneca who wrote The Shortness of Life
You are living as if destined to live for ever, your own frailty never occurs to you; you don’t notice how much time has already passed, but squander it as though you had a full overflowing supply – though all the while that very day which you are devoting to somebody or something may be your last.
People often ask me how I manage to do so much, but I don’t think I do so much. What I do is to live life passionately, living as the hero of my own personal story, trying as little as possible to fall into zombie mode.
And, you know what? The numbers aren’t that important, they’re only an estimate after all, but the quality certainly is. I can’t control the numbers but I can choose to live a passionate life. Today.
Posted in from the dark room, photography on September 7, 2007| 2 Comments »
Posted in from the consulting room, from the reading room, health on September 7, 2007| 2 Comments »
In Kieran Sweeney’s “Complexity in Primary Care” he quotes from Toon’s “What is Good General Practice?” paper –
The consultation is the patient’s forum for coming to understand her illness, not merely a rational understanding, but an understanding which involves the emotions and which contributes to the growth of the individual.
Oh, how, very, very true.
Print that out. Take it with you next time you have to consult a doctor. That’s what the consultation should be about – it’s YOUR forum, for YOU to gain an understanding of what’s happening in a way that will “contribute to the growth of the individual”.
There’s your standard. Measure your doctor visits against it!
Posted in from the consulting room, from the reading room, health, science on September 7, 2007| 6 Comments »
I’ve just read Kieran Sweeney’s “Complexity in Primary Care” (ISBN – 1-85775-724-6) and found it both stimulating and agreeable. I am SO glad that books like this are being published. I’ve read both of his previous books – “Complexity in Healthcare” and “The Human Effect in Medicine”. He’s one of those authors who is bringing the fairly new ideas of complexity science to the attention of clinicians, I think with the intention of trying to redress the balance a bit. Medicine has become very reductionist and limited in its approach and whilst this has paid off in dealing with acute diseases it hasn’t helped in dealing with chronic disease OR in the wider desire to maintain health. In addition to this, the modern thinking he scopes out in these books really has a chance of helping us to reclaim a much more human-centred practice of medicine.
Here’s a couple of quotes from the book which really struck me –
The requirements of medical research are limited by insisting that an answer should be numeric, otherwise it is not a real answer.
That reminded me of what I just posted the other day there about the value of patients words over numbers. It also reminded me of this – I once heard a dentist describe his experience of replacing a retired colleague in a specialist facial pain clinic. He didn’t know that his predecessor had devised a scoring system for pain and had trained all his patients to report a figure as a way of telling him how much pain they were experiencing. Apparently, this man would become quite frustrated with patients who tried to talk about themselves and would even say “Stop. Not another word! I want the next thing to come out of your mouth to be a number. Nothing else! On a scale of 0 to 20 how has your pain been?” The dentist who was telling me this story was quite baffled when he took over the clinic and saw one patient after another come in for follow-up consultations and just say “17” or “12” or “9”, then refuse to say another word. They were too frightened! He didn’t find their answers very useful.
It seems that a lot of what I’m reading just now is challenging me to think about non-rational thought, intuition, gut-feelings, whatever you call that way of understanding the world. In particular I’m reading Solomon’s “Joy of Philosophy” and loving it – he argues this point. See what Sweeney has to say about it –
At the theoretical level chaos and complexity can help us to synthesise evidence and intuition. They dignify the notion of intuition, and re-establish the importance of experience and wisdom, seeing them as emergent properties of the thousands of iterative, recursive interactions in consultations.
Oh, I like that! He’s showing that from basic principles of complexity science we can understand intuition is a way of knowing which arises through our interactions with each other. Thank goodness someone is making a call for us to develop a form of medicine which is greater than the sterile world of “Evidence Based Medicine” with its mind-numbing protocols and guidelines.
Posted in from the reading room, science on September 7, 2007| 1 Comment »
The European Science Foundation (ESF) has published a Forward Look (FL) report System Biology: a grand challenge for Europe. They are seeking to raise awareness of this “novel” way of looking at biology. The quote really caught my eye
“There is a growing awareness in medical science that biological entities are ‘systems’ — collections of interacting parts.”
Well I never! Holism comes to mainstream science! Seriously, this is good news. I think one of the main reasons why medicine has hit its current ceiling on the relief of suffering in chronic disease is its predication on a reductionist model of biology. Complexity science and the study of chaotic systems AND the development of scientific research under the headings of psychoneuroimmunology and psychoneuroendocrinology are beginning to shift the ground away from the reductionists who think that the study of parts is sufficient to those who acknowledge that we in reality, we live in a messy, complex world, which can only be understood through a holistic approach which studies contexts and connections.
Posted in from the dark room, photography on September 6, 2007| 1 Comment »
Seeded web, originally uploaded by bobsee.
I love the idea of webs. It reminds me of Deleuze’s metaphor of the rhizome – the sprawling root system of a plant with no centre and no core – defined by its connections. It’s the metaphor of the network, of communities, of collaboration and inter-independence.
This particular web is stunning because it is thickly coated in wind-blown seeds.
The image of seeds, and the image of the web, entwined like this is exciting. It suggests connections, beginnings and endings.
Look at it again – it’s like a fairy hammock – maybe that’s what it is! A place for fairies to relax and chill out – what do you think, Amy? A nice relaxing bed for your fairies (after they’ve done with all that coughing and scaring the tourists!!?)
Posted in from the reading room, life, personal growth on September 6, 2007| Leave a Comment »
Good post today on iwillchangeyourlife.com about how people go through life on “autopilot” with some points to make you ask yourself how much of your life is on “autopilot”.
This idea is right alongside my basic premise for this blog – living life unconsciously – whether you call that being on “autopilot” or living like a zombie – is just not a rich or healthy life.
The answer lies in recognising yourself as the hero of your own story – becoming more aware, engaging with life more consciously and actively creating your own path.
Posted in from the reading room, from the viewing room, health, life, personal growth on September 6, 2007| 13 Comments »
Do you know about The Secret? This was originally produced as a TV series by an Australian TV producer called Rhonda Byrne. It wasn’t shown by the TV channel which commissioned it and was turned into a DVD, book and now a whole movement it seems. Wikipedia has a pretty thorough article on the background story plus a presentation of the views of people for and against The Secret. According to their article, the book which inspired Rhonda Byrne was the 1910 The Science of Getting Rich by William Wattles. They also say the principles espoused are pretty much the same as those of the New Thought movement.
What is The Secret?
Well, it’s the “Law of Attraction” – which is the belief that if you ask for something, then the Universe will deliver it. Of course this will strike a chord if you ever read “Ask and you will receive” in the New Testament of the Bible, or if you came across the New Age “Cosmic Ordering” idea. These ideas have been around a long, long time but “The Secret” has packaged it up in a DaVinci Code kind of way to sell it to a new market.
I watched the film recently and found I had an enormous mix of responses. You can find a whole range of views and opinions about this film on the net – everything from the view that “The Secret” is the answer to life, the universe and everything to the view that’s it’s psychobabble nonsense. Actually, I think it’s neither of these things.
When I watched the film, which is basically a talking heads documentary, I enjoyed the graphics, but didn’t enjoy the rather trite little “drama” scenes used to illustrate the points, and the speakers, for me, ranged from inspiring to PU-U-U- LLEEEEZE – Let me OUT of here!!! (I’ll leave you to make your own judgement on exactly who fell into which category!)
It is EASY to be critical of this film – you could easily say it is simply positive thinking embellished to the point of magical thinking. However, there are useful and inspiring messages in it –
But where it goes wrong for me is pushing it into the magical realm of a belief system that we entirely create our own reality and that our thoughts will be responded to by the universe which will give us exactly what we think. This lends itself to a blame-the-victim mentality where suffering is seen to be a result of the person’s own thinking – they brought cancer, or violence, or abuse, or whatever, down on themselves. This is distasteful and naive. It also lends itself to the no-effort-required view that you don’t have to strive for anything you can just lust after it hard enough and the universe will deliver it!
And yet, and yet……….
Here’s the most interesting thing for me about it so far. It’s not the positive thinking bit. I reckon that idea is difficult to challenge. There’s ample evidence from psychologists and philosophers that taking a deliberate focus on the positive can be beneficial not just in terms of mental health, but in terms of physical health, and recovery from serious disease. It’s also quite evident in life terms – from personal to business success.
Now it is quite clear to me that just thinking you can be whatever you want to be will bring that about is nonsense – as a 53 year old, 5 foot 5 inch man I will never get to play for the Harlem Globetrotters and I won’t run in the British 400 metre Relay Team at any Olympic games! You can NOT just “be whatever you want to be” – there ARE limits!
No, the interesting bit to explore is the idea that you create your own reality. I think this cosmic ordering kind of idea has got it the wrong way round. It doesn’t seem credible to me that there is some mysterious magical force in the universe which delivers your every wish if only you visualise it clearly enough and apply a type of faith to believing that whatever you visualise will come to pass. I do believe, however, that if you focus clearly on something, you raise your awareness to daily phenomena, events and circumstances which are relevant to that focus. I also think if you apply a highly motivated creativity to your focus then you are way more likely to actually achieve your goals. But I think this direction of flow is the opposite to that espoused in The Secret.
Stuff happens. Good stuff and bad stuff. We live in a chaotic universe. The development of scientific understandings of chaos and complexity shows us that chaos has both features of cause-and-effect and of randomness. Some things happen as a consquence of the actions of ourselves or those of others. But some things happen that are literally random. Nothing to do with anyone’s thought processes. How we cope with that stuff, how we adapt to that stuff……..that’s what radically alters our experience.
So our reality is created both by our experiences and by our reactions to our experiences. It’s not created by an intelligent or magical universe and it’s not created just by our thinking.
I’m glad I watched The Secret. Yes, its tacky focus on materialistic consumerism feels small-minded and is uncomfortable. But, it’s also thought-provoking and inspiring.