Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘life’ Category

One of greatest joys of blogging is how it facilitates the discovery, and creation, of connections. My daughter, Amy, who writes the wonderful lessordinary, has developed a whole online network of friends through her blog. She’s a great networker and deliberately creates her blog to make and develop connections with others. Let me tell you a little story which will illustrate how this is such a core quality of hers. When she left school, she was accepted for an English Literature course at Stirling University. We drove her to the halls of residence in the grounds of the university at the start of the first semester and helped her unpack her small collection of belongings from the boot of the car and pile them in bags and cardboard boxes into her small room. If you’ve ever been to a student hall of residence you’ll have an idea of what they are like. This one was typical in my experience – a series of corridors full of identical box like rooms each with the same furniture (most of it custom built to fit the room exactly and screwed to the floor or the walls). At first sight its a bit bleak and very impersonal. It wasn’t easy to leave her there. I shouldn’t have worried though because the very next day she phoned and said when the door closed behind her and she sat in that bleak room alone she cried. Then she thought, well, everyone else in this corridor is in the same boat as me, I’ll go and say hello. So she set off down the corridor, knocking on all the doors, introducing herself and inviting the “freshers” down to the pub for a drink and a chat. She never looked back.

It strikes me that blogging can be a bit like that. Each of these posts is like a little room, something to be discovered, a door to knock on. I’ve been blogging for about 18 months now and there have been over 55,000 visitors in that time. Almost 2000 comments have been left and every one of those comments is like a little knock on the door.

I hope that some of the posts you read here will be like little discoveries for you, that you’ll hear that knock on the door, and that you’ll find new connections and new possibilities in your life. But let me tell you of a recent experience where it’s happened the other way around for me.

A couple of weeks ago a new commenter, Ian, came along and left comments on a few different posts. At the same time he emailed me and introduced himself. In his introduction he described the trail which led to our connection. Ian said he’d been in Ullapool recently and had picked up a copy of “Why do people get ill?”, completely resonated with it and decided to read some reviews online. One of those reviews was the one I wrote on this blog. He browsed my blog and discovered a like mind. He also recognised my name and remembered a poet friend of his mentioning me to him some time back – Larry Butler. Well, not only has Ian left some really interesting links other sites in his comments, but last week he emailed me and asked if I’d like to go to a traditional music concert at the Tolbooth in Stirling. It was an eye-opener for me. Or maybe, more accurately, and ear-opener. Too much to say about it here in this post but here’s the bit which is most relevant to this story. The three musicians, for some of their tunes, all played mandolins. I can’t say I’ve ever been attracted to the mandolin, but one of the people I’ve met through blogging is the wonderful Dr Tom Bibey. He plays mandolin in a bluegrass band and as I listened to the music I not only heard the mandolin differently from how I’ve heard it ever before but – and here’s my point – I heard it differently BECAUSE of the connection with Tom Bibey – and enjoyed it as never before, but the whole evening, and the people I met there, showed me another possibility – that of playing music. I listen to music all the time. But I haven’t played music since I was a teenager. I think it’s probably time to change that. That thought, the possibility of picking up a musical instrument again, is like a rediscovery of part of me. But several decades on, its a rediscovery of a different me, as I’m obviously much changed by my experiences and my connections of the last thirty years or so.

We are who we are because of the people we connect with. Human beings are highly social creatures. It’s impossible to know what a person is like by putting them into a room all by themselves. We reveal ourselves through our relationships. We create ourselves through our relationships. The patients I meet every day change me because they tell me their own, unique stories. Their stories are told from their own, unique perspectives. They are the heroes of their own stories. And in the telling of their stories they show me different ways of seeing and experiencing the world. The world is different after a story. I am different after a story.

Remember that a story has several components – a teller, a tale, something told about, and a recipient of the tale. Through the sharing of our stories we change each other. We create each other.

One of Ian’s links was to Roman Krznaric who has written a fabulous downloadable booklet called “Empathy and the Art of Living”. Go get it and read it. I highly recommend it. Here’s a key extract –

Most books or courses on the art of living focus on how we can
discover ways of improving our own lives. The emphasis is,
unashamedly, on what can be done to help me. I find this kind
of self-help approach too narrow, individualistic and narcissistic.
In my experience, those people who have lived the most joyful
and fulfilling lives have dedicated much of their time to thinking
about and helping others. It has given them not only personal
satisfaction but also a sense of meaning. They have, in effect,
lived a philosophy of ‘You are, therefore I am’.
Einstein recognised the need to move beyond self-help when
he said: ‘Strange is our situation here upon earth. Each of us
comes for a short visit, not knowing why, yet sometimes
seeming to divine a purpose. From the standpoint of daily life,
however, there is one thing we do know: that man is here for
the sake of other men.’ We will always feel something missing if
we attempt to live alone, hermetically sealed in an isolation of
our own making, thinking only of our own pleasures and pains.
The mystery of existence is constituted by our relations with
each other.
The twentieth century was an age of introspection, when
psychoanalysis impelled us to search for who we are by looking
inside our own heads. But the art of living involves escaping
from the prison of our own feelings and desires, and embracing
the lives of others. The twenty-first century should be the age of
outrospection, where we discover ourselves by learning about
other people, and finding out how they live, think and look at
the world.
Empathy is at the heart of how to live and what to do, and is
the ultimate art form for the age of outrospection.

Now I don’t know if Roman has invented that word – outrospection. But if he has then it’s hats off to him! This SO hits the spot! I find myself completely agreeing with this viewpoint. There’s way too much in the world of self-help which turns people in on themselves but most of what I’ve read about happiness includes an emphasis on the human need to connect to others, to connect to a sense of whatever is greater and more than ourselves, to be engaged with the world.

Who I am evolves and changes every day as I live in the world. I’m changed by my daily experiences, not least because of the other people I meet and connect with each day. This very fact brings back to my mind one of the books I have most enjoyed in recent months – Linked by Albert-Laszlo Barabasi.

Barabasi makes it crystal clear that to understand anything in this world we need to examine the connections, the links – how very Deleuzean!

I am because you are

Read Full Post »

I’ve been reading the WHO report on the social determinants of health recently. It’s a big document but written in crystal clear language and structured in a way which makes it easy to get the key messages.

THE key message is

Social injustice is killing people on a grand scale

And their positive response to that fact

The Commission calls for closing the health gap in a generation.

Quite a challenge!

The report is full of astonishing facts, but here are two connected ones which completely grabbed me –

40% of the population of the world exist on less than two dollars a day

OK, that’s enough to make you stop and think as you hand over the money for your daily latte!

Every cow in Europe is subsidised by European taxpayers to the tune of, yes you guessed it, TWO DOLLARS A DAY!

Now that makes you think about the choices we make! Doesn’t it?

Read Full Post »

This is rule number three in Daniel Pink’s “Johnny Bunko” book which I mentioned a wee while back. There are two reasons why both the Johnny Bunko rules and this particular rule came to my mind this week.

Firstly, I’ve just been finding that in recent times this little phrase has often popped into my mind. “It’s not about you”. The value of this phrase is its power to re-orientate you. It’s only natural that our inner subjective experience is dominant. So when we feel certain strong emotions – anger, frustration, sadness, and, yes, even happiness – our default understanding of what is going on tends to emerge from the emotions themselves. It’s only a short (unconscious) step from there to “Why is he (or she) treating me this way?” or “Why is he (or she) upsetting me?” or some such similar question. The assumption is that the other person is behaving the way they are with the intention of having an effect on us. Not just an intention, but, a primary intention. We find ourselves thinking that the person is behaving this way because they want us to have a certain emotion. In other words, if it wasn’t for me, he (or she) wouldn’t be behaving this way. Well, you know, maybe in some instances, it’s true. But in many more instances it isn’t! Whether it’s true or not, however, this train of thought gives away our personal power to the other person. We give them the ability and the will to effect the emotions that we are experiencing. An easy, and a quick, way to undermine this whole reaction is to say to yourself “It’s not about you”. Just considering this as a possibility can be liberating. It allows you to shift your conscious focus from yourself to others. At best, it opens the doors to the possibility of a more empathic and more understanding interpretation of the other person’s behaviour.

“It’s not about you” also came into my mind recently when considering the advice a French philosopher, Hadot, who writes in his book “N’oubliez pas de Vivre”, about the almost spiritual exercise of taking a view from on high. When you climb a mountain and survey the world from the mountain’s heights you have an intense shift of perspective. Take this a little further and consider the viewpoint of one of the astronauts looking back at the Earth from the Moon. (Whenever I think that thought, I can hear Nanci Griffiths singing “From a Distance” inside my head!) Whether you physically climb or fly high above your daily world, or whether you take a journey in your mind using your imagination, this experience of looking down on life from on high also has the potential to give you an “It’s not about you” moment. You can become aware of your smallness and of the brevity of your own life in the grand scheme of things.

There’s another sense too in this “It’s not about you” perspective. Time and time again I hear patients tell stories of great suffering which shrinks or even, at least temporarily, disappears, when they connect to others, when they feel, express and act their love for others and in doing so feel a surge of love and meaning in their own lives. Managing to focus on others is not easy when your suffering is so great that it is overwhelming all aspects of your life, but those who manage it, even for short periods, often report feeling transformed.

There was a second reason why Johnny Bunko came to mind this week and that was the post by Daniel Pink on the Johnny Bunko blog where he related Barack Obama‘s Presidency bid to the six Bunko lessons. Go read it for yourself. It’s a good introduction to Johnny Bunko!

Read Full Post »

There was a headline item on the morning news which, even though, it wasn’t really new, was still shocking. In Lenzie, Scotland, the life expectancy of a child who lives there is 81 years. Eight miles away, in the East End of Glasgow a child of the same age as the one in Lenzie has a life expectancy of 53 years. It’s not just the fact that such premature death is so common in present day Scotland, but the difference! 28 years! Neither of these facts are trivial. Wouldn’t you think that such a problem would command the attention and action of a society? What’s the problem? Funnily enough, it certainly isn’t a problem to be pushed off into the NHS to solve. Yes, the NHS has to provide the services to help the people who are suffering from the illnesses which cut their lives so short, but this is a much more complex problem than one which doctors and health care teams can effectively address.

Research by Prof Wilkinson and others has made it crystal clear that economic and social inequality is the heart of the problem. If we don’t address that as a society, we will never bring about any significant change to consign such shocking headlines to history.

These startling facts come from the WHO’s Commission on the Social Determinants of Health.

Sir Michael Marmot, chairman of the commission, said: “The key message of our report is that the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age are the fundamental drivers of health, and health inequity.” He added: “We rely too much on medical interventions as a way of increasing life expectancy.”

And what kind of response has come from the government to this report? Ann Keen, health minister for England said –

The UK is at the forefront of tackling health inequalities, but the challenge of reducing the gap in life expectancy is still very much an issue.

Really? At the forefront? In fact, over the lifetime of the present UK government, inequality has increased significantly, not decreased. Isn’t it time to deal with this issue more honestly?

Read Full Post »

Life’s amazing variety

I recently read “Findings” by Kathleen Jamie. She quoted a short phrase from a Louis MacNeice poem in one of her essays…….

World is suddener than we fancy it.                                                                                                                                         World is crazier and more of it than we think,
Incorrigibly plural.

This is from his poem, “Snow“. She only quoted the last two words “incorrigibly plural”……..one of those phrases which I read and which suddenly stops me from reading any further. What amazing phrase! I know how the unpredictability of life can be confusing, even scary, but I love how life can’t be pinned down by a single formula. I love how life constantly surprises us……way beyond what we could expect or imagine. And I love the complexity of world…….there’s always more to discover, always more to explore.

Read Full Post »

Natural inspiration

Which of these creatures inspires you? What, if anything, could you learn from them?

busy bees
snails pace
morning rabbits

Read Full Post »

I think poets have not only the keenest powers of observation but their words illuminate. The world looks different after reading poetry. I’m not referring to particular passages which have changed my perception or understanding of particular places or experiences. I’m referring to, well, what would you call it? The poetic stance? The poetic viewpoint? The poetic way of living maybe……

When I was a teenager (a LONG time ago) I bought a little book by the poet Stephen Spender. It was called “Life And the Poet”. It was a small paperback with a darkly yellowed cover. It was published in 1942 apparently. I’m sure I must have it somewhere but I can’t lay my hands on it right now and it’s almost 40 years since I opened it and read any of it. But I seem to remember two things he said. One was that he said poets should be like visitors from another planet. It was his way of saying a poet should approach the world with wonder and amazement (a bit like those French philosophers I read recently). I liked that a lot. It stuck. And he also said, I think (bare with me, this memory is a long way off!), that poetry taught us how to “make life anew” and that was a reason to live. That stuck too. (or maybe I’ve invented that for myself after all these years……I’ll need to find my old copy, or another one, and read it again)

I paid a visit recently to the lovely Watermill Bookshop in Aberfeldy
Watermill Bookshop Aberfeldy

As I browsed the shelves my eye was caught by a book entitled “Findings” by Kathleen Jamie (ISBN 978-0-954-22174-4). Never heard of the book before, and I’d never heard of the author either, but the back cover described her as an “award winning poet” who has an “eye and an ease with the nature and landscapes of Scotland”. I opened the book and the paper under my fingers made me stop and wonder. It felt lovely. A soft roughness if you can imagine such a thing. Immediately it felt natural, and special, and thrillingly sensuous. This feels like a lovely book, I thought. Now that doesn’t happen often. I can enjoy the weight, the feel, the scent of a real book (no, computers will never replace the book), but I can’t remember when I ever before picked up an unknown book like this and felt transfixed. It caught me. Physically. So I sat down in one of the many comfy, leather armchairs and I started to read. Did I have any doubts? From the moment I held it in my hand, did I have any sense that I’d put it back on the shelf? I don’t think so. I think I knew I’d relish, yes, that’s the right word, relish this book. I bought it of course.

Findings

It’s not a book of poetry, but a book of essays – a poet’s living.

Some of the subjects she writes about are familiar to me. Orkney, salmon ladders, prehistoric stone markings, the Surgeons’ Hall in Edinburgh and the Edinburgh skyline. But even the familiar seemed brand new in her eyes, in her words. She’s a keen observer of nature, especially birds, and in the essay entitled, “Peregrines, Ospreys, Cranes” she writes this…..

This is what I want to learn: to notice, but not to analyse. To still the part of the brain that’s yammering, “My God, what’s that? A stork, a crane, an ibis? – don’t be silly, its just a weird heron”. Sometimes we have to hush the frantic inner voice that says “Don’t be stupid” and learn again to look, to listen. You can do the organising and redrafting, the diagnosing and identifying later, but right now, just be open to it, see how it’s tilting nervously into the wind, try to see the colour, the unchancy shape – hold it in your head, bring it home intact.

That’s what I want to learn too – to notice, to look, to listen, without processing it all, but taking the experiences home and turning them over later. My camera helps me do that, but Kathleen Jamie’s words inspire me to write more down, to write it down as soon as possible……not the analysis, the experience, the perception, the observation. To relish the “emerveillement” of living.

Read Full Post »

Here’s an interesting article you can read at timesonline. It’s about the writer Colin Thubron. He says that he had a car accident back in 1978 and fractured his spine, some ribs and dislocated his shoulder. As a result he ended up in hospital for a few weeks.

The enforced idleness of lying flat on my back in hospital sent my mind into overdrive; I became more and more of a megalomaniac, and there was now some element of wanting to confront the fear. I decided there must be something bigger to write about, and I conceived the idea of walking the Great Wall of China and driving round Russia. Those ambitions were what kept me afloat. The Russian book was my first success, and it might not have happened without the accident. I don’t think the accident changed the trajectory of my emotional life, but it left me with a greater sense of my own vulnerability, and the need to maximise whatever time is left.

There are a number of points there which caught my attention. First of all, none of us would choose to have a serious accident, just like none of us would choose to be ill. But stuff happens! Accidents, illness and death don’t always happen to other people! How you react to the event is what determines the course of life thereafter. For Thubron it was a time of enforced “idleness”. He used the time to reflect on how life was going (holidays and “artist’s dates” are nicer ways to do this than accidents and illness!), and in that reflection decided it was time to think bigger. There’s the second point. He took the time to dream and he dreamt big! That led to what he describes as his “first success”, his book about Russia. Thirdly, look what he says in the final phrase……

but it left me with a greater sense of my own vulnerability, and the need to maximise whatever time is left.

You can be too aware of your vulnerability. Some people I meet are paralysed by insecurity and fear. But some awareness of it is a good thing. It’s a good thing if it leads to what he describes as “the need to maximise whatever time is left.”

Making the most of today. A wise counsel.

Read Full Post »

I have a real love hate relationship with statistics. I’ve heard it said that all men love figures. Well, I’m not any different that way. Numbers interest me. On the other hand, however, I hate statistics! Actually, that’s not really true. What I hate is when statistics are given as “the truth”, or are given greater weight than human experience. My preference is always for stories. I am completely hooked on stories. The work of Gigerenzer really impresses me and I was reminded of his work yesterday when I read a piece on the BBC site about statistics. The piece is written by Michael Blastland and I enjoyed his style. He started off by picking up on a news item which claimed that vitamin E increased the risk of death by 14%. As he rightly points out the risk of death for all of us is 100%, so what point was the journalist trying to make? That the risk of death if you take vitamin E is 114%?! The thrust of the article is that we need to reconnect figures to human experience. He suggests we do this in two ways –

First, we need to remember that not much in life is either/or. According to the research, there’s something in the claim that Vitamin E supplements can be harmful. But, as with the consumption of salt, or even water, much that can kill is also essential to good health. The world does not divide easily into what’s toxic and what’s not, what’s safe and what isn’t. Risk is simply a way of measuring where we stand on the messy middle ground – which is almost everywhere. What matters in that messy middle is the relevant human quantity: how much supplementary vitamin E? A little won’t do any harm (or, probably, much good). A lot, especially if you are getting on in life, might. So a 14% increase in risk of death does mean something, but only if you say at what dose (high), for which group (the elderly), over what period (a single year, not in a lifetime).

The second common problem with any percentage increase like this, also crying out for a dose of real life is: what’s it increased from? Because 14% might be a lot if you start somewhere big, next to nothing if you start somewhere small. A 100% increase from one in a million becomes two in a million. So what? A 100% increase in the number of bullets in a revolver – if you are playing Russian roulette – well, that makes a difference.

I loved his concluding paragraph –

A percentage is not really a number, it is a share. The simple question to keep in mind is one that always strives to put it into a proper, human context: “A share of what? A share of a lot – or a share of a little?” Better still: “A share of who?” Keep it real.

Read Full Post »

fairies

I love seeds. They fascinate me. Once you see which plant produces which seed then you can look at a seed and imagine how it might turn out if it finds fertile ground and grows to maturity. But if you look at a seed which comes from a plant you’ve never seen before, it is totally impossible to imagine the mature plant which lies as only a potential inside this seed.
Maybe it’s just the way my mind works, but I often think the same thing when I look at a baby. What potential lies in this little one? How will they be as a fully grown adult? It’s astonishing really.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »