Having just blogged about living with uncertainty, I stumbled across this –
Gilda Radner, by the way, died in 1989, aged 42, from ovarian cancer.
Posted in from the reading room, life, personal growth on October 16, 2007| Leave a Comment »
Having just blogged about living with uncertainty, I stumbled across this –
Gilda Radner, by the way, died in 1989, aged 42, from ovarian cancer.
Posted in from the living room, life, personal growth on October 15, 2007| 14 Comments »
Two things got me thinking about certainty, uncertainty and risk on the way to work today.
First off, as I started to descend the two flights of concrete steps to the low-level platform at Queen Street Station, I heard this disembodied voice of a Scotrail employee saying “Customers are reminded to take care on the stairs and use the handrail provided”. I realised that they’d installed an automatic system which would play this message repeatedly every time somebody stepped onto the staircase. AAAAAARRRGGGHHH! I felt like shouting! “Thankyou for reminding me! I was just about to throw myself recklessly head-first down your concrete steps cocking a snoot at your shiny metal handrail! I won’t do it now! You reminded me just in time!” Good grief! What next? What with hot water taps that have warnings that say “This water is hot” (!!! Really???!!) So, that was my first thought. What is all this about warnings of all the terrible things that might happen these days? A variation of this same theme is surely those government bods who reckon they can keep us safe from terrorism by confiscating toiletries and baby milk before people get on planes!
Then I get on the train (having successfully managed yet again to negotiate a whole flight of stairs without falling down!) and I pick up a copy of the free newspaper “Metro”. My eye is caught by a piece about genetic tests to predict what diseases we might get, and here’s this quote from a woman in England who has a family history of breast cancer and she’s saying how great it would be to have genetic tests that told us exactly what diseases we were going to get and goes on to express her preference for the development of tests that would tell you exactly when you are going to die too!
What do you think about that?
Would you like to have a test that would tell you exactly what disease you were going to get and your exact time and date of death? (Of course, no test in the world will ever predict the chances of you dying in an accident – make sure you pay attention to that Scotrail message when negotiating stairs!)
But, seriously, do we want such certainty? Do you?
In Reckoning With Risk, Gerd Gigerenzer, repeatedly returns to Benjamin Franklin’s aphorism
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.
But this really is at the core of a tricky issue. As far as I’m aware, human beings are the only creatures endowed with an imagination capable of enabling them to imagine their own deaths. Psychologists say that all fears are, at source, ‘existential’ fears (the fear of death, of ending, of non-existence). This knowledge of this one certainty can make life difficult for people. Many people consult doctors because they are afraid that a symptom is a feature of a mortal disease. Many people are trapped in routines because they fear what might happen if they try something different, or stray into previously unexplored territory. We even have a certain type of “scientist” who seeks to present every one of their findings and opinions as the certain Truth, and there are goodness knows how many experts who reckon they know for sure what is best for us!
OK, I accept that I need security in life. We all do. If I really couldn’t reasonably expect to travel to work tomorrow why would I even set out? But these things are variables and probabilities. There really are no guarantees – well, except death and taxes (Benjamin was right again)
Tell me what you think.
How much do you want certainty? What kind of risks are you prepared to take?
Posted in creativity, life, personal growth on October 9, 2007| 4 Comments »
Everywhere we see a continuous play between forces of creation and those of destruction.
Right inside the cells of our bodies these forces and unceasingly active. Biologically they’re known as “anabolic” and “catabolic” effects. Anabolic functions build and catabolic ones break things down. We need both to be functioning well to be healthy. If they are in complete balance there’s a dynamic status quo – part of what we call “homeostasis” (a complex set of balances). If catabolic processes dominate the system degenerates and degrades. To grow, the anabolic forces have to dominate.
Makes sense, huh? Whilst creativity might involve breaking some things down, we can’t grow anything by reducing it……the building, creative processes have to be predominant. How does this fit for your life? How much energy do you spend pulling things or people down? How much time do give to destruction? And how much energy do you spend creatively building things, helping people to grow?
It’s not hard to find critics, especially cynical, destructive critics, but time spent with them is rarely rewarding. Isn’t it much more life-enhancing to be with creative people, those with positive energy and outlook, who solve problems and are motivated to make things better?
We need the critics. We need those who seem to thrive only by pulling things down. All heroes need challenges. We grow by engaging with the challenges and overcoming them. But it’s also worthwhile being aware of the toxic effects of the nay-sayers.
It strikes me that life is short and is best spent predominantly with creative, positive-minded people. They energise. They support. They help us grow.
Posted in humour, life, personal growth on September 9, 2007| 3 Comments »
Posted in from the reading room, life, personal growth on September 6, 2007| Leave a Comment »
Good post today on iwillchangeyourlife.com about how people go through life on “autopilot” with some points to make you ask yourself how much of your life is on “autopilot”.
This idea is right alongside my basic premise for this blog – living life unconsciously – whether you call that being on “autopilot” or living like a zombie – is just not a rich or healthy life.
The answer lies in recognising yourself as the hero of your own story – becoming more aware, engaging with life more consciously and actively creating your own path.
Posted in from the reading room, from the viewing room, health, life, personal growth on September 6, 2007| 13 Comments »
Do you know about The Secret? This was originally produced as a TV series by an Australian TV producer called Rhonda Byrne. It wasn’t shown by the TV channel which commissioned it and was turned into a DVD, book and now a whole movement it seems. Wikipedia has a pretty thorough article on the background story plus a presentation of the views of people for and against The Secret. According to their article, the book which inspired Rhonda Byrne was the 1910 The Science of Getting Rich by William Wattles. They also say the principles espoused are pretty much the same as those of the New Thought movement.
What is The Secret?
Well, it’s the “Law of Attraction” – which is the belief that if you ask for something, then the Universe will deliver it. Of course this will strike a chord if you ever read “Ask and you will receive” in the New Testament of the Bible, or if you came across the New Age “Cosmic Ordering” idea. These ideas have been around a long, long time but “The Secret” has packaged it up in a DaVinci Code kind of way to sell it to a new market.
I watched the film recently and found I had an enormous mix of responses. You can find a whole range of views and opinions about this film on the net – everything from the view that “The Secret” is the answer to life, the universe and everything to the view that’s it’s psychobabble nonsense. Actually, I think it’s neither of these things.
When I watched the film, which is basically a talking heads documentary, I enjoyed the graphics, but didn’t enjoy the rather trite little “drama” scenes used to illustrate the points, and the speakers, for me, ranged from inspiring to PU-U-U- LLEEEEZE – Let me OUT of here!!! (I’ll leave you to make your own judgement on exactly who fell into which category!)
It is EASY to be critical of this film – you could easily say it is simply positive thinking embellished to the point of magical thinking. However, there are useful and inspiring messages in it –
But where it goes wrong for me is pushing it into the magical realm of a belief system that we entirely create our own reality and that our thoughts will be responded to by the universe which will give us exactly what we think. This lends itself to a blame-the-victim mentality where suffering is seen to be a result of the person’s own thinking – they brought cancer, or violence, or abuse, or whatever, down on themselves. This is distasteful and naive. It also lends itself to the no-effort-required view that you don’t have to strive for anything you can just lust after it hard enough and the universe will deliver it!
And yet, and yet……….
Here’s the most interesting thing for me about it so far. It’s not the positive thinking bit. I reckon that idea is difficult to challenge. There’s ample evidence from psychologists and philosophers that taking a deliberate focus on the positive can be beneficial not just in terms of mental health, but in terms of physical health, and recovery from serious disease. It’s also quite evident in life terms – from personal to business success.
Now it is quite clear to me that just thinking you can be whatever you want to be will bring that about is nonsense – as a 53 year old, 5 foot 5 inch man I will never get to play for the Harlem Globetrotters and I won’t run in the British 400 metre Relay Team at any Olympic games! You can NOT just “be whatever you want to be” – there ARE limits!
No, the interesting bit to explore is the idea that you create your own reality. I think this cosmic ordering kind of idea has got it the wrong way round. It doesn’t seem credible to me that there is some mysterious magical force in the universe which delivers your every wish if only you visualise it clearly enough and apply a type of faith to believing that whatever you visualise will come to pass. I do believe, however, that if you focus clearly on something, you raise your awareness to daily phenomena, events and circumstances which are relevant to that focus. I also think if you apply a highly motivated creativity to your focus then you are way more likely to actually achieve your goals. But I think this direction of flow is the opposite to that espoused in The Secret.
Stuff happens. Good stuff and bad stuff. We live in a chaotic universe. The development of scientific understandings of chaos and complexity shows us that chaos has both features of cause-and-effect and of randomness. Some things happen as a consquence of the actions of ourselves or those of others. But some things happen that are literally random. Nothing to do with anyone’s thought processes. How we cope with that stuff, how we adapt to that stuff……..that’s what radically alters our experience.
So our reality is created both by our experiences and by our reactions to our experiences. It’s not created by an intelligent or magical universe and it’s not created just by our thinking.
I’m glad I watched The Secret. Yes, its tacky focus on materialistic consumerism feels small-minded and is uncomfortable. But, it’s also thought-provoking and inspiring.
Posted in life, personal growth, philosophy, science on August 31, 2007| 1 Comment »
A couple of posts yesterday got me thinking about this whole “gut feelings” or “intuition” thing. First off, on the Petri Project, “No guts, No glory”, discusses the work of Gerd Girenzer, who has just published “Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious”. Apparently, Malcolm Gladwell’s “Blink” was based on Girenzer’s ideas. He’s shown that the apparently “rational” approach of making big lists of pros and cons before making a decision can lead to worse decisions than following your gut instincts. I particularly liked this quote –
One should also not overlook that in science itself, you need intuitions. All successful research scientists function, to a degree, on gut instincts. They must make leaps, whether they have all the data or not. And at a certain moment, having the data doesn’t help them, but they still must know what to do. That’s when instinct comes in.
Then on Christopher Richard’s wonderful SlowDownNow site he’s written “Creativity, the slow way where he writes about Guy Claxton’s “Hare Brain Tortoise Mind”. Apparently, Guy Claxton has coined the term the “undermind” for that mental function of slow knowing, or intuition. Christopher is so right when he says –
I appreciate science. I don’t want to give the wrong impression. But the scientific way of thinking now dominates how we think about everything. We have become myopic. Mathematics and science are the most valued subjects, but the arts are now second-class.
There are many ways to know something. Rationalism is good and has its place but there’s a kind of approach to science these days that seems to say that all that matters is what can be measured. Well, love, passion, well-being, health, meaning, purpose, beauty, aesthetics…….I could go on…..are not quantifiable. Yet they matter to us. We make our choices using more than rational thinking (and, don’t make the mistake of saying the alternative is “irrational” thinking). Intuition, aesthetics, and emotions all come into play, along with logic, in trying to lead an examined, worthwhile life.
Science, however, shouldn’t be limited to what can be measured. I think Deleuze had it right – science is a way of thinking – a way of thinking about function. Science helps us to understand how things work. But we also need to think about concepts, percepts and affects. It’s not “anti-science” to be clear about the limits of science.
Posted in creativity, from the reading room, life, personal growth on August 31, 2007| 1 Comment »
Great post (in fact great series) across on successfromthenest on creativity. It was the title of the post which caught my attention “Saying you’re not creative is like saying you’re not human.” I couldn’t agree more.
I do find it helpful to understand people by considering how they adapt to (or cope with) changes and challenges, how they engage with the world and how they create – I agree with Tony Clark about this – a lot of people think they aren’t creative because they don’t draw or write but we are all creative every day. How you make decisions, how you problem solve and how you express yourself is all based on creativity.
Posted in from the reading room, life, personal growth on August 28, 2007| 3 Comments »
When I was a GP (a Family Doctor) I had a pony tail but once I became a grandfather I cut it off. One of my patients brought her daughter to see me where I work now (Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital) having been to consult me herself several years ago. She said her husband asked her where she was going today and she replied “To see Dr Leckridge at the Homeopathic Hospital”. He said, “Oh, that hippie doctor!” “What do you mean?” she asked. “The one with the pony tail,” he replied. “Oh, he doesn’t have a pony tail any more” she told him and he replied “Aye, but it’ll still be on the inside!!”
“I hope it is!” she said to me.
Conforming is a zombie way of life in my opinion. It’s good to know your uniqueness and to be yourself. There’s a great post on this across on lifehack today. It’s written by Adrian Savage who writes the great Slow Leadership blog. I love his conclusion –
Conformity has very little to recommend it. Trust yourself and trust others. Our world has so little trust even a little more is precious. If you can’t trust who you are—the naturally valuable, curious, interesting, and exciting person you were born to be—why should anyone else trust you?
Mediocrity and inner frustration are the true price of conforming. Only those with the courage openly to live their dreams can ever hope to find lasting satisfaction with their lives.
I also love the quote he’s chosen from Rollo May’s “Man’s Search for Himself”
“The opposite of courage in our society is not cowardice…it is conformity.”
Go on, trust yourself, and be the hero of your own life story.
Posted in from the dark room, life, perception, personal growth, photography on August 24, 2007| 1 Comment »
The heart of the flower, originally uploaded by bobsee.
There’s a whole world in there isn’t there?
In Leisure, by Joseph Pieper, he refers to the act of contemplation as a way of perceiving without effort. In Eastern religious traditions meditation is a common practice (and scientific studies support the claims that meditation practice can bring many health benefits). However, for those of us from different cultural backgrounds to those where such spiritual practices are taught, meditation can seem alien and difficult.
Contemplation as effortless perception however is accessible to all of us. First you have to notice something. Then you have to slow down, stop and gaze, letting the object of your gaze fill your thoughts. You don’t have to figure out exactly what you are looking at. You shouldn’t ask yourself any questions about it.
Just take a few moments in silent contemplation.
It’s good for you.
Flowers capture me. On so many levels. From catching my attention, to contemplation, wonder, awe and curiosity.
What captures you?