Feeds:
Posts
Comments

My virtue map

In another post I’ve described this idea of virtues. What interests me is this. Which characteristics and qualities would I hope to develop in my life? I believe that we all create our own personal hero narratives as the main way of having a sense of self and of growing and developing that self. This kind of life project of growth has been variously described by other authors. Jung focussed on what he termed “individuation”. The evolutionary biologists, contemporary neuroscientists, and neurophilosophers have all shown that human beings are continuously in a process of development of strengths, characteristics and qualities.

I’ve conducted my own synthesis of Franklin’s and Seligman’s virtues and strengths to come up with a personal virtue map.

Here’s an image of the map –

mindomoexport.jpg

You’ll see this has five main “nodes” – each of these refers to a major virtue cluster – Wisdom in the middle (because for me that’s the centre of it all), then Calm, Action, Transcendence and Temperance. Around each of these nodes I’ve picked a few qualities or characteristics that I’d like to be part of how I grow.

Here’s a summary –

Wisdom (which is about awareness of the world)

  • Curiosity
  • Love of Learning
  • Creativity
  • Understanding

Curiosity and Love of Learning are simply what they are – reflecting, enquiring and learning.

Creativity encompasses the ideas of ingenuity, of novelty, and of emergence.

Understanding encompasses the ideas of perspective, judgement, emotional intelligence and empathy.

Calm (stillness and serenity)

  • Silence
  • Tranquillity
  • Slow

Silence is about finding times without talking, without music or noise. It’s also about valuing conversation, not trivialising it.

Tranquillity is that calm that allows you to remain unflustered or unfazed in the face of trivial difficulties and random events.

Slow is about taking your time, savouring and relishing what you are doing.

Action (engaging with the world and with people)

  • Resolution
  • Perseverance
  • Industry
  • Sincerity
  • Kindness
  • Fairness

Resolution is deciding to do certain things and actually doing what’s been resolved to do.

Perseverance is sticking at something to see it through.

Industry is about being active

Sincerity, kindness and fairness are values which can be used to assess the quality of acts towards others.

Temperance (living within limits)

  • Moderation
  • Frugality

Moderation is about enjoying something without spoiling it by taking it to excess.

Frugality is about not being wasteful, spending productively and well.

Transcendence (living beyond our selves)

  • Appreciation of beauty
  • Gratitude
  • Hope
  • Humour
  • Zest

Appreciation of beauty in all things – the physical world, people, the Arts.

Gratitude and hope are the building blocks of positivity. Gratitude looks back and keeps positive experiences alive whilst hope looks forward and creates the conditions for positive experiences in the future.

Humour and zest are forms of passion. Humour is a lightening of the heart and zest is an energy of the heart.

So, what’s next? I created the mindmap using Mondomo (the map’s name is “virtues”) and exported it as a jpeg which I’ve now printed out onto a 6 x 4 inch index card. I’ll start carrying it around with me and my idea is reflect on it every morning and every evening. By doing that I hope I’ll bring focus and intention to these “virtues” – and if they’re worth developing, I’ll experience the payoff in an increased quality of my life. I’ll keep you posted!

Virtues

My brain seems to work in a particular kind of a way. It’s good at spotting connections, building patterns. I’d say it’s a creative brain. When I read a book certain words or passages ring bells, make lights flash, prod my memory of other passages I’ve read elsewhere and I build on what’s already there, not just in a way that gives me more knowledge in my store, but, rather, more dynamically creates something new. Some new understanding that can change my view of who I am and what kind of world I live in.

In my consulting room I find that’s one of the crucial questions I want to find the answer to – what kind of world does this person live in?

I think we all have brains that work that way actually. I think that’s how we learn, connecting new experiences and observations to our previous ones. It’s a constant process and, at best, it increases our understanding.

Sometimes the connections seem quite serendipitous. Do you get that? When a particular word or phrase or idea seems to keep popping up everywhere for a while? I don’t mean the obvious recurrences which come from reading a few books on the same subject area. I mean they pop up in books, newspaper articles, movies, song lyrics and so on. I’m sure I could write a post or two on specific words that do that but let me tell you about one of the ones that’s popping up just now – virtue.

Now this is a word I’d say I probably have never used and it’s not even a word that has held any appeal for me, but I was reading The Happiness Hypothesis recently and came across Jonathon Haidt’s discussion of virtues. He begins by telling of Benjamin Franklin (you can read about his virtues here). I’m a Scot living in Scotland but I quote Benjamin Franklin almost every day. Not a wide range of quotes mind, just one. However, this was a brand new story and it intrigued me. What do I do when something catches my interest? Google it, of course. Well, Franklin’s virtues sounded a bit archaic to me but his little descriptions of each one I thought revealed a man of remarkable insight and balance. But they didn’t feel quite right for me.

Haidt goes on to link this idea of virtues both to the ancient Greek and religious virtues and to the modern practice of positive psychology. That lead me to pick my two Seligman books off my shelves again and remind myself what he’s said. I say remind myself but to be honest I had no recollection of him using the term virtues at all so it was really going back to notice what I failed to notice first time round. Seligman’s virtues seemed different from Franklin’s. Different but not completely different (sorry, this is the way my mind works but now I’m thinking, I wonder what Monty Python’s virtues are? OK, back to the subject) You can read about Seligman’s virtues here.

What I did next was what I often do with such things. I sat in a cafe with a notebook and pen and wrote the words down over a two page spread. It’s a kind of mind mapping technique (not the fancy Tony Buzan variety, just a simple way of seeing connections and patterns). What I do is take the key words or phrases that are bubbling in my brain and write them out not randomly but in clusters so that words which have some connection for me are written close to each other and those that don’t seem so strongly connected are written further apart. Am I making that clear? I should take some photos of the process cos its actually quite a visual thing.

That gave me three clusters of Franklin’s virtues and four of Seligman’s. Only two of the clusters overlapped. Continue Reading »

Daniel Gilbert in Stumbling on Happiness makes the point that we make things up when we remember, we make things up when we observe the here and now and we make things up when we imagine the future.

He uses a version of a card trick in his book to illustrate a point about how we observe and remember. I tracked down an online version of it – look at this card trick and see if you can work out how its done.

Then when you’ve done that, watch this video of another card trick. The video also explains how the trick is done and the revelation really is a revelation. You’ll be amazed!

When I read Authentic Happiness by Martin Seligman I was very taken by the notion of identifying your strengths and building on them (as opposed to the more traditional New Year’s Resolution method of picking out your greatest weaknesses and hopelessly wrestling with them!). At the time, somehow, I missed his reference to “virtues”. Then when I read The Happiness Hypothesis recently, Jonathon Haidt’s description of virtues and his reinforcement of the idea of a link between ancient virtues and the findings of positive psychology sent me back to read Seligman’s book again. And there it is, clearly, in black and white – he lists what he says are the SIX main virtues (dropping seven of Franklin’s?) and the 24 “strengths” which lead to the development of those virtues.

Here are his SIX virtues –

  1. Wisdom
  2. Courage
  3. Humanity
  4. Justice
  5. Temperance
  6. Transcendence

Quite different from Franklin’s, at least, at first sight.

Let me summarise his “signature strengths” for you. These lead up to the virtues.

Wisdom

  • Curiosity
  • Love of learning
  • Judgement
  • Ingenuity
  • Emotional intelligence
  • Perspective

Courage

  • Valor
  • Perseverance
  • Integrity

Humanity

  • Kindness
  • Loving

Justice

  • Citizenship
  • Fairness
  • Leadership

Temperance

  • Self-control
  • Prudence
  • Humility

Transcendence

  • Appreciation of beauty and excellence
  • Gratitude
  • Hope
  • Spirituality
  • Forgiveness
  • Humor
  • Zest

Now, I’m sure you’ll see when we come down to the level of what Seligman calls strengths there is considerably more overlap with Franklin’s virtues. However, there are significant differences.

If you’d like to read more about Seligman’s Signature Strengths and Virtues I suggest you go have a look at his website (it’s free) and read the book Authentic Happiness.

Solid as a rock

Sandstone, originally uploaded by bobsee.

Everything changes.
We say “solid as a rock”, don’t we? Well, over time, even rock doesn’t stay the same.
Look at this amazing sandstone. I saw this in a wall at St Andrews. Isn’t it incredible how soft and malleable it appears? And isn’t it amazing how as the wind and the rain interact with the stone this web-like structure emerges from would’ve initially been a smooth-surfaced stone?

I was inspired recently reading about Benjamin Franklin’s virtues tool for personal growth. Apparently he wanted to continuously improve his character so he read a lot about virtues to see what people said about the qualities and characteristics a person might hope to develop. He summarised the various authors by collecting together the 13 virtues which he thought most authors agreed.

He then made himself a chart with the 13 virtues down the first column and the seven days of the week making up the other columns. Every day he reflected on his behaviour and put a black mark in any box where he felt he had acted in a way which failed a particular virtue. He did this throughout his adult life, focussing on one particular virtue each week to improve himself.

He showed himself his improvement through the decline in the numbers and spread of black marks.

Now I have issues with that particular method but I’ll return to that in another post.

The 13 particular virtues are interesting and although written in what now seems old fashioned language, the principles he elaborates in relation to each virtue show he had a thoughtful, tolerant and balanced approach to virtues.

Have a look at them. What do you think? Would you sign up to all of these? If not, which would you remove from your list? And would you add any he hasn’t included?

If you want to follow in his footsteps you can download of pdf of his chart here and use it either as a standalone or as an integral part of the marvelous HipsterPDA project!

Here they are –

  • Temperance – eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation
  • Silence – speak not but what may benefit others or yourself;
    avoiding trifling conversations
  • Order – let all your things have their places; let each part of
    your business have its time
  • Resolution – resolve to perform what you ought;
    perform without fail what you resolve
  • Frugality – make no expense but to do good to others
    or yourself; that is, waste nothing
  • Industry – lose not time; be always employed in
    something useful; cut off unnecessary actions
  • Sincerity – use no hurtful deceit; think innocently and justly;
    speak accordingly
  • Justice – wrong none by doing injuries or omitting
    the benefits that are your duty
  • Moderation – avoid extremes; forbear resenting injuries
    so much as you think you deserve
  • Cleanliness – tolerate no uncleanliness in body,
    clothes or habitation
  • Tranquillity – be not disturbed at trifles or accidents
    common or avoidable
  • Chastity – rarely use venery but for health or offspring;
    never to dullness, weakness, or the injury of our own
    or another’s peace or reputation
  • Humilty – imitate Jesus and Socrates

The Happiness Hypothesis by Jonathon Haidt. ISBN 978-0-099-47889-8.

This book is by a Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Virginia. The book’s subtitle is “Putting Ancient Wisdom and Philosophy to the Test of Modern Science”. I read it because it was one of three books about happiness discussed by Jean Kazez here. I really enjoyed it. His writing style is easy and at times humorous. He discusses the understanding of happiness from the perspective of ancient Buddhist and Greek thinkers and in the light of findings from cognitive science and the more recent positive psychology.

He makes a good case for the idea that happiness in the result of several factors – some genetic (the given of the physical functioning of an individual brain), some situational (the conditions of life) and some behavioural (the choices we make, the actions we take). I’ve not really considered the first of those before. I guess I’ve thought that things like happiness, depression, optimism and pessimism are all learned phenomena that emerge from the experience of the events which happen in an individual’s life and the sense that individual makes of those experiences, the stories they tell themselves and others about their life. Recently though, both with certain patients in my practice and with what I’ve been reading in that crossover area between neuroscience, psychology and philosophy, I’ve been coming to understand the more complex and intimate links between the body and the mind and between the physical and the subjective. So it makes sense to me that as we don’t all have either a body or a mind which functions exactly the same way as anybody else’s that experiences of positive and negative emotions will be present to different degrees in different people. What he refers to as a person’s “affective style” emerges from the interplay of approach and avoidance behaviours which is influenced both from their genetic make-up and their early life experiences. I find that a helpful concept.

He shed a light on quite a few other issues for me. I like this phrase –

…those who think money can’t buy happiness just don’t know where to shop

He then goes on to explain the different effects of spending money on objects as opposed to spending it on quality time and activities with loved ones.

He distinguishes pleasures from gratifications – a pleasure is a sensory and/or emotional delight. It’s transient and if repeated too often the brain adapts to the stimulus and the amount of pleasure drops (you might like ice cream but eat too much of it at a sitting and the pleasure payback fades). A gratification is an activity which fully engages you, draws on your strengths and allows you to lose your self-consciousness. Gratifications improve your mood for longer and you don’t tire of them in the way you tire of pleasures.

He comes down in favour of positive psychology and its emphasis on understanding your strengths and playing to them, linking this to the older idea of acquisition and development of virtues. What goes along with this is his emphasis on taking actions rather than passively sitting waiting for happiness to just float past.

It is vain to say that human beings ought to be satisfied with tranquility; they must have action; and they will make it if they cannot find it. (Charlotte Bronte)

I liked what he had to say about goals. I often find that talk of goal-setting lacks something but I found it quite hard to put my finger on why. Here’s the explanation. First from Shakespeare –

Things won are done; joy’s soul lies in the doing.

And from the scientific perspective he describes “effectance motive” – we are all driven to make things happen. We get more pleasure from striving towards our goals than we do in achieving them.

His conclusion is this –

Happiness is not something that you can find, acquire, or achieve directly. You have to get the conditions right and then wait.

And he recalls Tolstoy to point to the areas where we need to get the conditions right –

One can live magnificently in this world if one knows how to work and how to love…..

Through love and through work (in the broadest sense, not work just as employment) we can be engaged with others and with the world and we can experience the joy of making things happen, drawing on our strengths, building our characters, and experiencing meaningful lives.

Now the trombone is not an instrument I have much affection for but this little animation I found on youtube is immensely pleasing and the music is by the Voodoo Trombones – on this track they sound like a Carribean flavoured variety of Lemonjelly

Makes you want to dance, lifts your heart……

Happiness

I read a really fabulous article by Jean Kazez on Philosophy Now. It’s a review of three books about Happiness. I was SO impressed with her discussion that I popped over to Amazon and bought all three (while I was there I put her own book into the basket too). I’m almost finished the first one now “The Happiness Hypothesis” by Jonathan Haidt and I am thoroughly enjoying it. I’ll post more about later but for now let me say he writes very well, and with a nice sense of humour. He considers what Buddhist and Greek thinkers have said about happiness and sets them against modern, scientific insights from neurology, evolutionary biology and psychology. He’s keen on positive psychology and that’s another point of agreement for me. I can’t remember right now how I stumbled upon positive psychology but when I was teaching in Japan a few years back one of the doctors there asked me if I’d heard of “Solution Focussed Approach”. I hadn’t, but when I read the textbooks they immediately made sense. See, one of my bugbears about health care is that it isn’t focussed on health at all – it’s focussed on disease, so to read about a therapeutic approach which explicitly focussed on how an individual might become well again was very appealing. It wasn’t long after that when I came across the writings of Martin Seligman. I was VERY impressed. So, reading Jonathon Haidt’s summary of Martin Seligman’s “Happiness Formula”, and his linking of the old idea of virtues to the new ideas of positive psychology sent me off again to the Authentic Happiness site where there are loads of interesting questionnaires which will help you understand what your own greatest strengths are. Go check it out if you haven’t done so already. I really recommend it!

Proof

The movie {Proof} starring Gwyneth Paltrow, Anthony Hopkins and Jake Gyllenhaal got me thinking (well, there’s a surprise you might say!) It got me thinking about a number of issues. Here’s a couple of them.

How do you prove anything? The basis of the scientific method is (according to Popper) falsification. He meant that nothing can be proven but testing can reveal a hypothesis to be false – and so science progresses, coming up with more and more robust hypotheses which are harder to disprove. Of course, in mathematics, advances are made by writing “proofs” which are solutions to puzzles or dilemmas I suppose (don’t ask me, I’m not a mathematician!). A key part of this movie is how to show who actually wrote the groundbreaking “proof” – the father (Robert), or the daughter (Catherine)? What’s the solution? Well, can it be shown that the daughter could NOT have written the proof? If that can’t be shown, then her claim to have written it can gain strength.

OK, I know, that all sounds pretty convoluted. Don’t let that put you off. This is an intriguing and engaging movie, and not at all hard work!

So that’s the first theme – how do we know what we know? How can we ever be sure of anything?

The second one is the theme of how our traits, skills, and qualities come from our roots, from our origins. We can see qualities in ourselves that seem inherited and we can see some of our qualities in our children. We don’t start with a blank sheet, but neither do we start with a fully written script. We make our lives our own and each and every one of us is unique and different but there are threads that run through us which trail way, way back into other people’s pasts. Catherine seems destined to carry forward her father’s work having inherited his mathematical genius but she hopes she has not also inherited his madness. When her father dies, her challenge is to become herself in her own right. This reminded me of Kieslowski’s Blue.

In “Blue” Kieslowski considers how loss creates the possibility of new beginnings. The main character, Julie, loses her husband and her daughter in a car crash in the opening scenes of the movie and her way of dealing with her grief is to try to rid herself of all memories and connections with them. She tries to start again. But there’s no such thing as a clean sheet. Deleuze showed that we are in a continuous process of becoming and that in every present there is the past and the future. Interestingly, in “Blue” there is also the question of exactly who created a work. In this case, who composed the great music – Julie, or her husband? How can we know?

{Proof} also made me think about what it’s like for two people to create together and how, when it works well, what is created can NOT be attributed solely to one person. Yes, sure, an individual can sit alone and create, but something different manifests itself when the creative process is shared. I think that’s a good example of why its important to know a person within the contexts and connections of their life.

Here’s a fanvid of {Proof} – clips set to “I think I’m Paranoid”, by Garbage

And here are the last few scenes of Trois Couleurs; Bleu