Feeds:
Posts
Comments

When less is more

One of the most interesting points made by Gerd Gigerenzer in his “Gut Feelings” is that in order to understand what has happened it is often useful to consider as much of the information you can collect as possible, but in order to assess something right now, or to make a prediction about the future, you can have too much information and it either confuses you or bogs you down in analyses.

One fascinating example he gives is of a competition to pick stocks and shares. Asked to pick from a given a list of 50 companies in which to invest an imaginary few thousand dollars, the experts and knowledgeable amateurs did a lot of research into the companies then constructed their portfolios in the light of this. Gigerenzer and his colleague went out into the street and asked a random 100 passers-by which companies in the list they recognised. They then made a portfolio of the 10 most frequently recognised companies and this is the portfolio which won hands down, beating ALL the experts.

He gives other examples of this phenomenon. Basically it seems that if we know absolutely nothing about a certain subject then predictions we make will be right no more often than they would by chance. If we know a LOT then our predictions are not great either. However, if we know just a bit, our predictions are very good.

He says this phenomenon is about using intuition rather than a rational analytic consideration of a problem and points out that this intuitive strategy works best in circumstances where uncertainty is high.

in the sky of grey and pink, originally uploaded by bobsee.

Look at these fabulous clouds – taken from above through the window of the plane from Paris to Edinburgh this morning. Reminded me of that photo I took of Ben Ledi when the sky was grey and pink.

Dawn over CDG

Dawn over CDG, originally uploaded by bobsee.

Just back this morning from a trip to Tokyo and I took this shot out of the plane window at Charles De Gaulle airport at dawn today

Gut Feelings

The relationship between intuition and reasoning has been cropping up all over the place for me recently.

I just read Gut Feelings by Gerd Gigerenzer (ISBN 978-0-7139-9751-4) and he gives one of the most cogent models of intuition I’ve ever read. He outlines what he calls “evolved capacities” – these are human qualities or characteristics which have evolved either genetically or culturally. They are language, recognition memory, object tracking, imitation and feelings like love. He makes a good case for the uniqueness of these capacities in human beings (claiming that neither other animals nor computer-based Artificial Intelligence have or ever will have them).

His model of intuition (or “gut feelings”) is that these evolved capacities interact with environmental structures around the individual and are processed through simple rules of thumb to produce what we recognise as gut feelings. I like this model. It fits well with discoveries in evolutionary biology, neuroscience and complexity science. I’m sure others will identify other qualities which fit with his idea of “evolved capacities” and I think the adaptive nature of rules of thumb applied appropriately in different contexts really works.

There’s no doubt that rationalism and logic are only two of the tools we use to understand things and I think Gigerenzer’s model of intuition highlights a major other set of tools which we use (maybe even more frequently than we do reasoning and logic). I also think it’s good to take the mysticism out of intuition and to distinguish it from simple guess work.

In this way of thinking intuition can be both developed and taught and I find that pretty exciting.

One of the key points he makes is that intuitive processes are especially helpful when dealing with situations which are very uncertain – prediction for example. This highlights a role for intuition in everything from health care to investment decisions.

I’ve long been aware that the practice of acute medicine in particular requires rapid intuitive skill – an over-reliance on data collection and analysis in these situations can be fatal. Right off the top of my head I can recall a child with meningococcal meningitis, a young farmer in rural Ayrshire with malaria and man with toothache who turned out to be having a heart attack. In all three of these cases I’m sure it was instant (and I do mean instant!) decision making that saved their lives. In each case the diagnoses were unusual for a general practitioner and none of them would have survived had I waited to do some tests before acting. I’m sure all doctors have had similar experiences – those instants where you “just know” that this is a serious life-threatening situation despite the lack of detailed evidence!

Uncertainty is a fundamental characteristic of  our lives and intuition is one of the key tools we need to deal with it.

Smart World

When in Tokyo I always pay a visit to my favourite bookstore – Maruzen in Oaza at Maranouchi near Tokyo Central Station. I love the top floor with its interesting English language section and always find some book there that breaks new ground for me. This time it was Smart World by Richard Ogle (ISBN 978-0462099217). Unfortunately books can be very expensive in Japan and even if you can afford them luggage soon gets unmanageable when you stuff your bags with too many of them! So I decided to have a speed-read of this book at one of the reading tables by the window.

I don’t know if you ever speed-read a book but with non-fiction books its quite easy. Most well written books have good summaries at the end of each chapter so what I read was the introduction, then the summaries of all the chapters.

I read enough to be thoroughly fascinated by it. The author focuses on the new science of networks to create what he calls the nine laws of the science of creativity, his thesis being that creativity is an emergent process of the function of networks. He draws heavily on the ideas of Varela and others about the concept of the embodied mind – the idea that we cannot understand the mind if we attempt to contain it to what happens inside a skull but rather have to understand it as inextricably woven into the environments in which it exists. It’s a small step from here to the idea of the extended mind – a mind that stretches out to network with other minds. From here he develops the notion of “idea spaces” where we see hubs or “hotspots” develop in the network. In other language these are like the “attractors” of complex systems, or like the websites which attract huge numbers of visitors and links. Out of these hotspots, tipping points occur (you’ll have come across this term as the title of Malcolm Gladwell’s book. Again in the language of complex systems these are “bifurcators” where the system undergoes a “phase transition” into a totally new and changed state.

He links these ideas to the human facility of imagination and makes the point that if we progress solely on the basis of existing knowledge then we can improve incrementally but we never achieve the big, significant, creative leaps. These latter require us to imagine what doesn’t exist and what might well not succeed, but we leap, and when it works, the world has changed.

He gives numerous examples of this but the one that caught my eye was the ipod. The ipod has changed the music world considerably but for it to be created a number of elements had to fall into place – Napster and its success in spreading the habit of downloading music, the MP3 file as a small enough sized music file to allow easy downloading, the minaturisation of hard disc drives, and Steve Jobs move from Pixar where he had gained the respect and confidence of media companies which allowed for their licensing of their music catalogues to Apple, and Steve and his team themselves for their imagination, design flair and ability to create a product unlike any other the world had seen before – one that looked good, was SO simple to use and just worked.

I like these ideas and I think its interesting to read an author who uses the analogy of networks and network science to advance them. They are entirely consistent with what we learn from the science of complex systems.

Oh, I’ve ordered a copy of the book from Amazon Marketplace and hopefully it’ll arrive shortly after I return home. Then I’ll take a bit more time with it and see what other thoughts it provokes!

Michikusa

I’m in Tokyo just now and this is such a fascinating city. It’s significantly different from not only Scotland but all the other places I’ve visited in the world. Firstly it’s vast. From my 18th floor hotel room I look out of mile after mile of skyscrapers and buildings. Each morning has been hazy outside but the weather forecast last night said a “typhoon was knocking at the door of Japan”, and although I’ve seen no sign of rain yet the wind had picked up a lot this morning. I love the cooling breeze when the temperature is 30 degrees plus and the humidity is around 80%! The winds have blown away the haze so much to my surprise I could clearly see the distant mountains way beyond Tokyo this morning (almost reminded me of home!)

The in-house hotel magazine is usually just glossy ads for expensive branded goods but this issue has an article about Tetsuya Chickushi promoting the idea of “Michikusa” (which roughly translated means “loitering on the way or taking a pause and looking round”). He promotes “Slow Life” and says he was inspired by the Italian “slow food” movement. He says michikusa is about stopping, allowing a little time to stray off the path and follow your curiosity and he mentions an activity of drawing up a michikusa map. What a wonderful idea!

Here’s his closing paragraph –

Traditionally, Japanese society has had a very strong homogenous nature, and the economic success of the modern age was attained as a result of everyone working together in the same direction without rest. And at very high speed, too. Even now, we continue to set our priority on speed, which is why we still tend to think about everything in a shallow, narrow and brief manner. But I believe that now is the right time for us to think pluralistically in a deep, broad and thorough manner. Perhaps, Japan is about to enter a phase when we should take a pause, sometimes even enjoying michikusa, and contemplate thoroughly on what true happiness is for us.

It’s an amazing world

These 360 degree panoramic images are simply stunning.

You can see The Colosseum, The Great Wall of China, Petra, the Taj Mahal, Machu Pichu, Rio de Janeiro, Chichen Itza, the Eiffel Tower, Giza Pyramids, Cordoba Mosqu, Angkor Wat and the Yulonghe River

These images take a long time to load, even with a fast connection, so be patient, take advice from Christopher , slow down and enjoy life.

Reckoning with Risk

Just read Reckoning with Risk by Gerd Gigerenzer (ISBN 978-0140297867) and it’s one of those books that has changed the way I think.

It’s about the way statistics are presented to us to create an illusion of certainty. We don’t live in a predictable world. In fact, Gigerenzer uses a quote from Benjamin Franklin (there he is again!) about certainty –

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.

He refers back to this from time to time throughout the book to remind the reader that when something is presented as certain, it probably isn’t.

Why would statistics be used to present us with an illusion of certainty? Well, two reasons mainly. Firstly, we can’t handle too much uncertainty. We need some predictability in our lives. If we really felt absolutely nothing was certain we’d be paralyzed. Every morning when I get on the Glasgow train I’m pretty sure I’ll end up in Glasgow (of course, being Scotrail, I’m not at all certain exactly when I’ll get to Glasgow! But I’m pretty sure I’ll get there all the same). Even though I have this degree of daily certainty I do know, somewhere in the back of my mind, that accidents happen, that people get sick and that one day I’ll die. And I have no way of knowing if any of those things will happen to me on the Glasgow train today. But if I tried to base my daily decisions on all of those possibilities I guess I wouldn’t even be getting on the Glasgow train!) The second reason, is that others – experts, organisations, authorities and companies – want to exert their power over us. (see how to make a zombie).

Gigerenzer’s response to this is education. His book illustrates how we are all innumerate. He bases the whole book on a small handful of scenarios which makes the book both easy to understand and quick to read.

Here are the two main things I learned from him.

We understand frequencies much, much more easily than we understand probabilities. Try this out on your friends (especially doctor friends) – here are two ways to present the same information about mammography –

The probability that a 40 – 50 year old asymptomatic woman has breast cancer is 0.8%. If she has breast cancer, the probability of a positive mammogram is 90%. If she doesn’t have breast cancer, the probability of a positive mammogram is 7%. Imagine a woman with a positive mammogram. What is the probability she has cancer?

When Gigerenzer tried this out on experts very few got it right! He then showed them this version –

8 out of every 1000 women has breast cancer. Of these 8 women with breast cancer, 7 will have a positive mammogram. Of the remaining 992 women who don’t have breast cancer, 70 will have a positive mammogram. Imagine a sample of women who have positive mammograms. How many actually have breast cancer?

See how easy the second example is? This is a very good mental tool for clearing away the confusion created by probabilistic statistics. He shows how to make a decision tree using this method. This is going to make it much easier to understand clinical trial results for me. How come I wasn’t taught something about this at Medical School?

The second lesson is more important because its about how to see through attempts to manipulate us with statistics. This is slightly more technical – there are three ways to present a comparison of two groups of people who have had, say, either two different treatments, or one group gets a drug and the other placebo. The three ways are Absolute Risk, Relative Risk and Number Needed to Treat. Let me quote one of his examples.

The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study published a Press Release about the use of statins (the lipid lowering drugs). It said that from a study comparing a particular statin to placebo is was shown that taking the statin “reduced the risk of death from coronary disease by 22%” – well, that seems pretty convincing doesn’t it? But look at the actual study. It compared two groups of 1000. One group got the statin. 32 of them died. The other got placebo and 41 of them died. The absolute risk is the proportion who died in the placebo group minus the proportion who died on the statin. That’s 0.9%. The relative risk is the absolute risk divided by the proportion who die in the placebo group. That’s where the 22% figure comes from. The Number Needed to Treat is 111. That is, that you need to get 111 people to take the drug for one of them to get the benefit of not dying. Well, I’m sure you’ll agree, not all three of these presentations seems the same. Gigerenzer shows how drugs companies and authorities routinely use Relative Risk to emphasise the potential benefits of their treatment while at the same time presenting the potential harms as Absolute Risks to minimize the impression of adverse potential. This is just manipulation. He makes a very good case for why we all deserve to give informed consent to treatments but how we rarely get the chance to be properly informed.

He makes the interesting point that experts often claim that their tests are absolutely certain – whether its cancer tests, HIV tests or DNA matching, but shows us how that cannot be so. There really are no such certainties and we shouldn’t believe anyone who claims otherwise.

I’d recommend this book. You won’t hear TV news the same way again. He’s right. Education is our way of liberating ourselves from the agendas of the experts and so called authorities. We should make up our own minds and learn how to do that.

How to be creative

Have you come across gapingvoid? It’s the website of Hugh McLeod who draws business card sized cartoons. His top post of all time is this one on creativity. It’s long but it’s worth it! And some of the cartoons are hilarious.

moss

moss, originally uploaded by bobsee.

This almost looks like a shot of the bottom of a pond but its not. I took it of moss while I was lying on the forest floor.
There’s an astonishing variety of mosses in a very small space when you look carefully.