Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Stress and asthma

Why do some people get asthma? (In the last 25 years, the number of new asthma cases in the UK has increased six fold among children and three to four fold in adults) Well, as is the case with pretty much every single disease we know about, nobody knows. We are meaning-seeking creatures. We want to make sense of what we experience in life. Who gets any disease without thinking “why me?” And that is a very, very hard question to answer. It would be more convenient if human beings were more like machines. We’d be able to work out exactly why a particular fault had occurred, we’d be able to understand the consequences of that fault and we’d be able to fix it. But human beings are not like machines (even if the way we treat people who are ill seems to assume that they are). Not only do we not know why asthma afflicts more and more people every year, but we cannot explain to any single, individual patient – this is why you have asthma.

One of the main reasons we can’t answer these questions is that we’ve only recently begun to understand that human beings, biologically, are complex adaptive systems. As such, they have particular characteristics which make the answers to these questions hard to find.

Disease is multi-factorial. There are many things which contribute to the development of a disease in an individual. Causation is, therefore, not simple. We can’t say “X’ causes “Y”. However, we can still observe carefully, and experiment and explore to try and understand what the factors are and how they interact.

Here’s an interesting study which tries to uncover some of the factors involved in the causation of asthma. It’s that old factor “stress” again. But this time, they’ve found something interesting and thought-provoking. Not only have they found that life stresses occurring during childhood seem more common in those who develop asthma, but they’ve discovered something interesting about exactly what kind of life stresses can have this impact. In a nutshell, the stress of parents splitting up and the stress of moving home seem associated with an increased risk of developing asthma. Other major events, such as the death of a close relative, or parental unemployment don’t seem to have the same impact. How do they know? The researchers used the finding of increased blood concentrations of the neuropeptide VIP (vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) as the objective manifestion of the stress response. This, and other substances which were also found to be raised, are known to be factors in producing allergic responses, like asthma.

I think this is a useful study. It shows us some of the mechanisms that connect life events to disease and it shows us that we can’t consider all life events to be the same. What matters is what is most stressful for the person experiencing the stress, not how others rate the stressfulness of an event.

The other day as I was on the way home from work, the train stopped in the middle of the countryside. You never quite know why a train stops somewhere between stations but you can be sure it means the train is delayed. A long time ago I realised that wearing a watch increased my sense of anxiety because I’d sit on a train which was just quietly doing nothing and I’d keep checking my watch to see just how much more delayed we were and figuring how much later I’d arrive than planned. I realised that I had absolutely zero control over the train’s movements and looking at my watch every couple of minutes wasn’t going to get me to my destination any faster. Taking the watch off let me look at other things instead – a book, a paper, a notebook, hey, even the outside world!

So as we sat doing nothing much I looked out the window and something caught my eye.

blackbird

No, not the buildings in the distance, but that blackbird sitting on the bush. I zoomed in to get a closer look.

blackbird

Look at him singing away! I couldn’t hear him from inside the train but a song immediately came into my head

I enjoyed the moment.

Here’s my suggestion for today. If you find yourself unexpectedly held up or delayed take a wee look around and see what you can see (or hear, or smell, or feel). What comes to your mind?

The life force

The concept of a “life force” fascinates me. What is it that enlivens a creature? What changes in that moment between life and death? I vividly remember the first time I had to certify that someone had died. That person was an old man who had died peacefully in a geriatric ward in the middle of the night. As a young doctor this was a diagnosis I absolutely wanted to get right. I took my time and completely convinced myself that this old man had indeed passed away. Perhaps because I spent so long over this, I found myself thinking long and hard about that borderline between living and dying. What changes in a moment? As I sat next to this man’s lifeless body, what had gone? How exactly do we die? Of course, as a doctor I’d learned about the stopping of the heart, about the ceasing of the lungs and about “brain death”, but the closer I looked the harder it seemed to me to discern the exact moment of death. Life and death seem two such absolute states. There isn’t really a transitional zone that is neither life nor death. Even “half-dead” is still life! All these years later I’m no closer to understanding exactly how to pin down the moment of death or to understand what disappears or dissipates at the end of life.

The “life force” (or the “vital force”) is an old concept to try and capture what it is that enlivens us, what it is that is present when we are alive, but gone when we are dead. In fact, for a long time the life force was believed to be an entity, but when the anatomists dissected human bodies and couldn’t find any such entity, the concept lost a lot of ground. Science, it seemed, had shown that no such entity existed and materialistic understandings of the human being became much more accepted than “vitalist” one.

It’s fascinating, therefore, to see the re-emergence of the life force in a totally new guise. Modern systems theory, and complexity science, both show that complex systems have certain characteristics which are remarkably like the old “life force”.

  1. Self-organisation. Complex systems (specifically, complex adaptive systems) have the ability to self-organise. They are made of many, many components, connections and systems, which co-ordinate with each other to maintain overall defence, to adapt and maintain homeostasis of the inner environment, and to be self-repairing.
  2. Autopoiesis. Living systems have the unique characteristic of “self-making capacity”. This is a term coined by Maturana and Varela. Autopoietic organisms can make and maintain themselves.
  3. Emergence. This is a fairly new term which captures that characteristic of being able to produce new, previously unwitnessed, behaviours.
  4. Consciousness. Finally, let me add the phenomenon of consciousness. Not every living creature has consciousness. However, consciousness is a phenomenon which, like the old “life force”, is actually not an entity but a behaviour, or an experience. OK, I know, this is way too simplistic a description of consciousness and clearly it isn’t the same as the life force (think of persistent vegetative states for example). But it strikes me that the life force is a similar kind of phenomenon.

I am repeatedly impressed with the strength of the life force in the patients I see. It seems to me that it’s the basis of their ability to cope, to grow, and to shine. It’s the basis of the fight to overcome disease and to say to Death, “not yet”. Without it, there is, indeed no life at all.

I’m reading Antoine Sainte-Exupery’s “Citadelle” at the moment. Here’s the line I read today which set me off thinking about this post –

The tree is more than first a seed, then a stem, then a living trunk, and then a dead timber. The tree is a slow, enduring force straining to win the sky.

That captures it for me. Aren’t we all the slow, enduring force of life straining to win the sky? The life force flows through us, maintains us, repairs us, and drives our growth. Amazing, isn’t it?

It’s not uncommon for people to talk about looking forward to retirement. In fact, longing for retirement. Even counting the days until they retire. But once they retire, then what? It’s probably because I love everything I do, and how I especially love my daily work, that the idea of retirement seems to me, well, put it this way………it’s how we think about illness and death – they are things that happen to other people! But increasingly people have a lot of life to live after the age of 65. Why’s this come to my mind just now? Well, in the Queen’s honours last week, one of the people honoured was Phyllis Self who turned 100 last year. One of the remarkable things about Phyllis is that she runs a garden centre – at age 100 that’s quite something – but here’s the thing that really struck me – there was a mention of the fact that she has run this garden centre for 36 years. That means she didn’t actually start the garden centre until she was 64 years old!

How many people do you know started a new business at the age of “retirement”? We need to think about life differently. We need to live ALL of our lives. Retirement should be a time of active engagement with life.

Garlic

fresh garlic

Garlic contains a substance called “Allicin“. Studies have shown that this substance can have beneficial effects on cancer, bacterial infections and in preventing blood clots. Research suggests that this substance is very fragile and if you want to benefit from it you should eat fresh garlic rather than bottles of chopped garlic.

The photo above shows the market in Aix en Provence. I’d never seen garlic for sale with such extensive roots! Apparently this is the freshest garlic you can find.

The garlic we use in cooking is “allium sativa”. There are a number of related garlic plants with different ones growing wild in different countries. The scent of wild garlic in a forest can be very powerful. Here’s some wild garlic I found by following my nose!

wild garlic

wild garlic

Apprivoise moi

One of the key scenes in Le Petit Prince is where the little fox appears. The fox declines the little prince’s invitation to play saying “you are still nothing more than a little boy who is just like a hundred thousand other little boys. And I have no need of you. And you, on your part, have no need of me. To you, I am nothing more than a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes.” This is what it’s like on a busy commuter train or as you weave your way through a crowded city street. You come close to many people; you might sit right next to them for an hour or so; or you might buy a coffee in the cafe right after they do and sit at a neighbouring table; but you don’t know each other, mean nothing to each other, make no kind of connection.

The fox says “Apprivoise moi”. What does this mean? The direct English translation is “Tame me”, but taming in English suggest some subjugation, some domination, and that’s not what is meant by the fox. Instead he means something like “befriend me”, or “captivate me”, “bind yourself to me” or “make me yours”. It’s a loving expression and it conveys the idea of creating a link or a bond between two people, or between a person and a creature. The fox says that if the little prince does this he will make them unique to each other in the world. He will make them special to each other.

The little prince takes this idea and thinks about a bed of roses he comes across and how all of these roses really mean nothing to him compared to the single rose which he has nurtured carefully in his garden. His rose is uniquely his. He is bound to her. She is special to him.

Later, the little prince saw a garden of roses. “You are not at all like my rose,” he said. “As yet you are nothing. No one has befriended you, and you are no one’s friend. You are like my fox when I first knew him. He was only a fox like a hundred thousand other foxes. But I have made him my friend, and now he is unique in all the world… He went on. “To be sure, an ordinary passerby would think that my rose looked just like you. But in herself alone she is more important than all the hundreds of you other roses: because it is she that I have watered, because it is she that I have listened to, because she is my rose.”

It’s an interesting concept, isn’t it? How we create loving bonds between ourselves and others, and in so doing, make people (or animals) special to us, make them unique.

The TV News each evening doesn’t carry many uplifting stories but tonight on channel 4 news they had a piece that grabbed me and fed my optimistic nature. It was about Filmclub. This is a project started by Director, Beeban Kidron, which introduces movies into schools throughout England. She’s had a trial running and it’s been hugely successful so it’s now being rolled out around the rest of the country.

“I think that stories and the telling of stories are the foundations of human communication and understanding. If children all over the country are watching films, asking questions and telling their stories, then the world will eventually be a better place. That’s how important I think FILMCLUB is.”

Oh, I agree, Beeban. Stories and the telling of stories really are the foundation of what it is to be human. Filmclub’s co-founder, Lindsay Mackie said –

“ Films have the power to raise your gaze and raise your game and give you a ticket to pleasure and enlightenment forever more….”

YES! Well, that’s aiming high, isn’t it? How wonderful!

I use movies a LOT in my teaching (I teach mainly doctors, but also nurses, dentists, vets and other health care workers). I know that some of you (yes, mrschili, I’m talking to you!) also use movies a lot in your own teaching work. This Filmclub idea has sparked a thought for me – what if I started a Filmclub for patients in the hospital where I worked? If I was going to do that, which movies would I show? Patients are often suffering and in distress. Which movies might be catalysts to discussions which encourage healing? Any suggestions?

Dementia is such an awful disease. It can be utterly harrowing to see the loss of self and independence of a loved one. I find it such a sad illness. So I was interested to read this piece of research from JAMA today.

One of the most difficult problems for dementia sufferers and their carers is the disruption of the normal circadian rhythms, so these researchers tried two interventions which might make a difference – melatonin and light. The patients who were treated with melatonin did experience improvement in their sleep but their mood deteriorated and they became withdrawn. Bright lights were fitted to the care homes and kept on throughout the day. Residents who lived with the brighter light AND who took melatonin showed the greatest benefits in both cognitive function and in reduction of depressive symptoms. The authors conclude by recommending the light plus melatonin regime, but point out that increased light alone made a difference and that melatonin without increased light should not be recommended because of the adverse effects on mood.

This is a nice study. Very simple intervention which apparently can make a useful difference.

Asparagus

asparagus

One day at the local market in Aix I saw this stall. Have you ever seen this much asparagus for sale? There’s a whole wall of it here!

I think asparagus is really tasty, but I don’t remember ever tasting it as a child. Do you have any foodstuffs which you didn’t taste until you became an adult but which you discovered you really enjoyed?

I decided to check out wikipedia and see what I could find out about asparagus before I posted this photo. I was interested to read that it has certain medicinal properties – not least that it can bring on an attack of gout, but that it’s been a traditional medicine for the treatment of urinary tract infections and stones.

There was one surprising fact I discovered though – it’s about the way asparagus consumption changes the smell of your urine! Apparently Marcel Proust commented on this claiming that asparagus “…transforms my chamber-pot into a flask of perfume.” It’s something I’ve been very aware of since I first ate asparagus, but the one thing I didn’t know was that only 40% of the population have the genes needed to be able to smell it! This may be something peculiar about the way my mind works but that fact suddenly made me think of the old zen puzzle – does a tree falling in the forest, where nobody is present, make a noise?

Isn’t it interesting that a smell might only exist if the person doing the smelling has a certain gene? Oh, and what on earth are we doing with a gene for smelling the metabolites of asparagus in the urine?

I love movies. I’m an addict. I think it’s my insatiable thirst for stories which hooks me. I’m not a fan of the blockbuster kind of movie that’s all special effects though. I like a movie which draws me in and absorbs me in the characters and the story. Of course, that fits with my other great addiction – books. I’m really never without a book and I’m often reading more than one book at a time.

I think movies are called movies, not just because they are “moving pictures” but because they can be so “moving” – they can stir our emotions so strongly. How do they do that? Well, here’s a slightly disturbing piece of research. Using the fMRI technique (the brain scan that shows which areas of the brain are active at any given moment) researchers observed which parts of the brain became active at particular moments in different movies and they used an interesting tool called “ISC” (Inter-subject Correlation) to see if different people had the same parts of the brain lighting up at the same moments. They picked a Hitchcock movie, “Bang! You’re Dead!”, “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, an episode of “Curb your Enthusiasm”, and an unedited video clip of a concert. The results were very different –

  • The Hitchcock episode evoked similar responses across all viewers in over 65 percent of the neocortex, indicating a high level of control on viewers’ minds;
  • High ISC was also extensive (45 percent) for “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”;
  • Lower ISC was recorded for “Curb Your Enthusiasm” (18 percent) and for the Washington Square Park, or unstructured reality, clip (less than 5 percent)

In other words, Hitchcock really was the master. His movie evoked the most similar responses in peoples’ brains.

“Our data suggest that achieving a tight control over viewers’ brains during a movie requires, in most cases, intentional construction of the film’s sequence through aesthetic means,” the researchers wrote. “The fact that Hitchcock was able to orchestrate the responses of so many different brain regions, turning them on and off at the same time across all viewers, may provide neuroscientific evidence for his notoriously famous ability to master and manipulate viewers’ minds. Hitchcock often liked to tell interviewers that for him ‘creation is based on an exact science of audience reactions.’ “

The researchers claim that these techniques pave the way for the development of “neurocinematic studies” – oh my!